How do you deal with unfamiliar words?
- Mrunal Tikekar
- Posts: 727
- Joined: 04 Jul 2019, 06:27
- Currently Reading: Heartquake
- Bookshelf Size: 291
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mrunal-tikekar.html
- Latest Review: Send Her Back and Other Stories by Munashe Kaseke
Re: How do you deal with unfamiliar words?
-
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 26 Apr 2019, 02:18
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 118
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-aditi-sapate.html
- Latest Review: Miracles Love a Believer by Stacy Manning Casaluci
- Reynaa
- Posts: 311
- Joined: 17 Apr 2019, 23:11
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 29
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-reynaa.html
- Latest Review: Sucsexful: by Rachel Martin
- Inkroverts
- Posts: 298
- Joined: 15 Jul 2019, 00:38
- Currently Reading: The Book Thief
- Bookshelf Size: 67
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-inkroverts.html
- Latest Review: Killing Abel by Michael Tieman
- Nym182
- Posts: 771
- Joined: 24 May 2019, 23:34
- Currently Reading: Harley Quinn
- Bookshelf Size: 36
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nym182.html
- Latest Review: Homecoming: The Unari Experiment Book 1 by Brian L. Harad
I follow very similar steps as you do actually! I first try to figure out generally what the word means via context clues. But if I am totally in the dark, I go to a trusty dictionary online and look up the definition and synonyms.
One thing I need to work on is how to pronounce certain words I have learned primarily through reading.
For Ex: I know what a trebuchet is (it's like a type of catapult) but in my head I always thought of it as tre-bu-chet. My husband and I were talking the other day and he started talking about "tre-boo-ch-a"s and I was like whhhaaaat... then in kinda hit me I've been thinking that word wrong the entire time haha
I've actually heard that that is a common thing for people who have primarily gained their vocabulary via reading!
- Ria710
- Posts: 452
- Joined: 11 Jan 2020, 20:52
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 166
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ria710.html
- Latest Review: The Magic Lantern by Charles Townsend
- Daniel Muky
- Posts: 184
- Joined: 01 Nov 2019, 05:54
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 36
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-daniel-muky.html
- Latest Review: Korian by Giorgio Garofalo
- Henrytbab
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 08 Mar 2020, 21:37
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 17
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-henrytbab.html
- Latest Review: The Secrets To Living A Fantastic Life... by Dr. Allen Lycka & Harriet Tinka
Not very often but when I do come across them, I use the dictionary. Now that you've mentioned Philip Roth's books, I will check them out.DennisK wrote: ↑05 Dec 2016, 15:19 Since reading a couple of Philip Roth's books, I've been questioning the extent and accuracy of my own vocabulary. I found that reading him, aged the pages of my dictionary by a few years. I wonder how people, while reading, deal with words that are not familiar. As for myself, I use several techniques: If the story captivates me – if there is a lot of suspense, I tend to skip over unfamiliar words as long as I can keep the meaning of the story intact. Sometimes, I can glean the meaning of the word by its association within the subject matter and its use within the sentence. In fact, that is how I built most of my vocabulary. For example, I was watching a TED Talk that hosted Mr. Forbes who was talking about how people form coalitions with members who may not like each other. He used the word, antipathy a number of times. His use of the word made it quite clear that antipathy meant a dislike for another person. So, without having to look the word up, I learned a new word simply by experiencing its use. But my understanding of this word is very shallow. Looking the word up, I discovered that antipathy is a deep seeded, instinctive dislike toward anything – like, some people have an antipathy toward snakes, or spiders. Some people have an antipathy toward people with a different skin color, or a different culture, or religion. Instead of bigotry, and prejudice, I now can color this subject slightly different by using the word antipathy. The word prejudice is simply a preference of one thing over another, but antipathy … in that word is an element of fear and hate. This is a new perspective. Forget prejudice, how do we deal with antipathy? Such is the power of words, and a more robust vocabulary. To my shame, my vocabulary is rudimentary – I'm terrible with crossword puzzles, and most of my words were learned through experiencing their use – nothing scholastic. How often are you confronted with unfamiliar words while reading? How do you deal with them?
-George Bernard Shaw
- Arite Seki
- Posts: 211
- Joined: 06 Jun 2019, 09:07
- Currently Reading: The Alchemist
- Bookshelf Size: 75
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-arite-seki.html
- Latest Review: The Maestro Monologue by Rob White
- Yearly Joy Besoy
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 09 May 2020, 04:57
- Favorite Book: We are Voulhire: Someone Else's End
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 34
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-yearly-joy-besoy.html
- Latest Review: Beating Death (resubmission) by Sean O’Banion
-
- Posts: 431
- Joined: 01 Aug 2020, 15:05
- Favorite Book: Wilderness Cry
- Currently Reading: Spirituality in the 21st Century
- Bookshelf Size: 80
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-readsbyarun.html
- Latest Review: Rescuing General Patton by Curtis Stephen Burdick
- Bigwig1973
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: 16 Apr 2020, 19:57
- Favorite Book: Notes from Underground
- Currently Reading: The Elements of Style
- Bookshelf Size: 503
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bigwig1973.html
- Latest Review: You, This Is Me...OVER?! by Clinton Beaudel Dooley
When I started reading in my youth, I used to look up words. Then, I started reading books I found in my parents basement, mostly classics, and I totally gave up on looking words up because there were so many to look up and I thought it interrupted the flow of the story. Perhaps I thought of writers as writing for the sake of the story, to thrill or to frighten - to make the reader cry or upset, to help the reader relax and so, interrupting the experience by looking up a word (unless it seemed really essential) wasn't worth the cost of ruining the experience of reading the novel. Later, when one has to write papers on books, looking up meanings becomes more necessary. I would still try to read the story for the sake of the story (philosophically, the word "qua" roughly means "for the sake or purpose of") and then I would also read again in a more technical fashion. Consequently, to this day, I probably have a more hazy understanding of certain words that I never got around to looking up. Being aware of this potential flaw of mine, I always made sure that I a dictionary or thesaurus around so I could check a words actual meaning before I handed in an essay. Now, I probably read three times. Once for the aesthetic value (in some technical books, that is almost impossible: like reading a Haynes repair manual for the beauty of word choice - like, OMG, he used "pully" instead of "belt" or "dual overhead cam" and not "twin cam"), another for a more thorough understanding, and the last for a perhaps most complete understanding. Even to this day, I think I know what "Thou shalt" means but I seriously doubt that I completely understand it.
La Belle Dame Sans Mercy, Merci, Maria - Chartier, Keats, Hamik?
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: 03 Jul 2020, 04:16
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 15
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-essywa.html
- Latest Review: ...on your way home...Do This by George Six
-
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 05 Aug 2020, 12:38
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 19
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sraby1.html
- Latest Review: We are Voulhire: A New Arrival under Great Skies by Matthew Tysz
- DennisK
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 470
- Joined: 12 Jun 2015, 19:00
- Currently Reading: Light in August
- Bookshelf Size: 39
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dennisk.html
- Reading Device: B00L89V1AA
The ambiguity of language is a subject of discussion that can go on, forever. For me, there is one word that I particularly dislike. This word brings to mind a movie scene from Abbot & Costello's Lost in a Harem when the words, “Poko Moko” is spoken. If you are as old as I am, you will know to what I refer. My hated word is, existential – and all of its derivatives. … well, I don't exactly hate it, but in most cases, when I am subjected to it, I want to throw my hands up and walk away.Bigwig1973 wrote: ↑23 Aug 2020, 14:23 Indulging in a literary experience without comprehension is a slanderous, incorrigible act resulting in the insulting defilement of aesthetic value or, Nah - man, I just don't feel like messing with that right now!
When I started reading in my youth, I used to look up words. Then, I started reading books I found in my parents basement, mostly classics, and I totally gave up on looking words up because there were so many to look up and I thought it interrupted the flow of the story. Perhaps I thought of writers as writing for the sake of the story, to thrill or to frighten - to make the reader cry or upset, to help the reader relax and so, interrupting the experience by looking up a word (unless it seemed really essential) wasn't worth the cost of ruining the experience of reading the novel. Later, when one has to write papers on books, looking up meanings becomes more necessary. I would still try to read the story for the sake of the story (philosophically, the word "qua" roughly means "for the sake or purpose of") and then I would also read again in a more technical fashion. Consequently, to this day, I probably have a more hazy understanding of certain words that I never got around to looking up. Being aware of this potential flaw of mine, I always made sure that I a dictionary or thesaurus around so I could check a words actual meaning before I handed in an essay. Now, I probably read three times. Once for the aesthetic value (in some technical books, that is almost impossible: like reading a Haynes repair manual for the beauty of word choice - like, OMG, he used "pully" instead of "belt" or "dual overhead cam" and not "twin cam"), another for a more thorough understanding, and the last for a perhaps most complete understanding. Even to this day, I think I know what "Thou shalt" means but I seriously doubt that I completely understand it.