Bad books, good movies
- StoneGolem
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 02 Jun 2011, 14:31
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Bad books, good movies
What movies did you think were actually better than the book.
For me, Children of Men was a way better movie than book.
- Jacob
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: 17 Apr 2011, 07:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
I suppose The Warriors was a far better movie then book, The Outsiders was equal, equal.
But most of the time they are right, with books you are using your imagination. The movie kind of kills the picture in your head with the book.
- StephenKingman
- Posts: 13994
- Joined: 29 Dec 2009, 12:00
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-stephenkingman.html
- StoneGolem
- Posts: 28
- Joined: 02 Jun 2011, 14:31
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Bighuey
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 22451
- Joined: 02 Apr 2011, 21:24
- Currently Reading: Return to the Dirt
- Bookshelf Size: 2
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 12 Sep 2011, 06:39
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Usually books are better than movies. Język oryginału: polskiStoneGolem wrote:Most people see a movie and say, "The book was totally better."
What movies did you think were actually better than the book.
For me, Children of Men was a way better movie than book.
Wpisz tekst lub adres witryny albo przetłumacz dokument. But surely there are exceptions...
- Boatman01
- Posts: 21
- Joined: 10 Sep 2011, 16:50
- Bookshelf Size: 0
I was writing a novel that involved a few scenes in antebellum New Orleans, and I figured I'd cheat and not go there myself, but read the famous novel instead, and have my fill of the scenery and the mores and what not. Turned out, the scenes that take place in New Orleans in "Gone with the Wind" have no New Orleans in it. He said, she said, he slept, she went, he came, they walked. Not a single street is described. No weather, no people, no slang, no steam emanating from the open doors of an eatery on the corner, nothing. NOTHING.
The movie was pretty impressive, though.
On the other hand, Shakespeare only looks good on the stage, and Dickens and Dumas on the printed page (even though Dumas did some playwrighting on the side).
You can't put Mark Twain on the screen. You can't even put Douglas Adams on the screen, as it turned out a few years ago.
- Tip the Bottle
- Posts: 879
- Joined: 09 Jun 2010, 21:06
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Pffffffffffffftt!!!! Maul maul maul.StoneGolem wrote:I know I'm going to get mauled with this one... but I'm going say the last two harry potter movies were a lot better than the book. Let the blood bath begin.
We will have to agree to disagree. Good day Sir!
When you're grateful to them for giving you the things you should already have anyway, ask yourself why."
-Lady in Blue, rebel broadcast
- Bighuey
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 22451
- Joined: 02 Apr 2011, 21:24
- Currently Reading: Return to the Dirt
- Bookshelf Size: 2
- Tralala
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 13:13
- Favorite Book: Retro Hell
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Nope. Can't agree with you on The Warriors. Not his best book, maybe (read The Bag), but definitely better than the movie. I love Sol Yurick! His books, I mean. JMO, though.Jacob wrote:Erm, kind of hard.
I suppose The Warriors was a far better movie then book, The Outsiders was equal, equal.
But most of the time they are right, with books you are using your imagination. The movie kind of kills the picture in your head with the book.
Gotta concur on The Outsiders. Good book, good movie.
Willard was almost better than Ratman's Notebooks, but only 'cause I know too much about rats, and the book was inaccurate in parts.
- BookBuddy
- Posts: 127
- Joined: 26 May 2011, 07:07
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Tralala
- Posts: 1059
- Joined: 28 Dec 2010, 13:13
- Favorite Book: Retro Hell
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Good ol' Stanislaw! I think I'd go batty if I tried to read one of his books.BookBuddy wrote:Solaris by Stanislaw lem. I remember seeing the movie which was nice but I wanted to understand it more so I read the book which was boring I understood even less. Actually I'm surprised I finished the book.
...but I'll have to change my quote now...
Thought of another one, maybe. A Clockwork Orange. The movie was a lot easier to understand. The book didn't start to "flow" for me until somewhere around chapter 7.
- Bighuey
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 22451
- Joined: 02 Apr 2011, 21:24
- Currently Reading: Return to the Dirt
- Bookshelf Size: 2
I saw the Swedish or Danish or whatever it was, version of Solaris years ago. I dont remember much about it so I probably wasnt that impressed with it. Didnt they make a remake of it a couple years ago?BookBuddy wrote:Solaris by Stanislaw lem. I remember seeing the movie which was nice but I wanted to understand it more so I read the book which was boring I understood even less. Actually I'm surprised I finished the book.
- Gannon
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 14464
- Joined: 17 May 2009, 01:48
- Favorite Book: Pillars of the Earth
- Currently Reading: Heaven's Net is Wide.
- Bookshelf Size: 52
- ferretbait
- Posts: 77
- Joined: 27 Sep 2011, 22:39
- Bookshelf Size: 0