Review by Shrabastee -- The Prize by Geoffrey M Cooper
Posted: 08 Jun 2018, 07:24
[Following is a volunteer review of "The Prize" by Geoffrey M Cooper.]

4 out of 4 stars
Share This Review
In his debut novel The Prize, the author Geoffrey M. Cooper brings forth a chilling tale. Dr. Pamela Weller, an up-and-coming young scientist and Dr. Eric Prescott, winner of the prestigious Lasker Award and a likely candidate for the Nobel Prize are both determined to find a cure for Alzheimer’s disease. In spite of the same end goal, their motivations are quite different. One wants to put an end to the disease, while the other is lured by the worldwide fame such a ground-breaking discovery would inevitably bring. As Pamela nears the goal, Eric cooks up devious schemes to humiliate her and steal all the glory. How can Pam prove herself innocent when even her trusted scholars, mentors and well-wishers have turned against her?
Before saying anything else, I must first convey my thanks to the author for showing a true picture of the cut-throat competition for novel discoveries that is very common in the scientific world. He shows us how even a highly accomplished and respected personality of the scientific community can lose his morality and scientific ethics when obsessed with fame and glory. He even loses basic humanity, sinking lower and lower, all to achieve just an award.
I found the plot development to be unique. For the first time, I encountered a book where pretty much everything depended on whether a scientific experiment had been designed in a way so as to cover all the loopholes. As a young researcher myself, it was interesting to see how the experimental set-ups employed to identify the anti-Alzheimer's drug without any doubt could end up being detrimental to Pam’s career. In my opinion, this plot showed Dr. Cooper in his element as a renowned professor. Also, indexing the chapters by dates instead of chapter numbers was a clever way to show the timeline.
The title and the cover of the book require special mention. The title can have myriad implications. What might a scientist consider as a prize - a chance to put his/her research for the greater good by finding a cure for a deadly disease? Or can the Nobel Prize be considered as the ultimate honor for a researcher, even if it comes at a cost of his/her moral values? A question to ponder over!
While I admit that a book should never be judged by its cover, the cover picture of this book seemed a symbolic one. The woman in the white lab coat might be running towards fame, or alternatively, towards truth. It certainly created a powerful first image about the theme.
The character portrayals were mostly real. Pam showed strong moral character and good judgment, undaunted even in the face of dire situations. Eric was the polar opposite of her in being greedy, ruthless and unscrupulous. The hypocrisy and opportunistic behavior of the Director of Langmere Institute, sadly, rang true. However, the character that appealed to me the most was that of Holly, Pam's postdoctoral student. She made a number of wrong choices, but those were driven partly by the frustration and insecurity she felt and partly by her greed. I could sympathize with that young researcher even though she went for desperate measures.
I felt at ease while reading the book since the day-to-day laboratory works, types of equipment or student curriculum the author mentioned were familiar to me. The rigorous selection procedure required for the tenure and the proceedings to deal with scientific fraud were enlightening to read. At the same time, I have to admit that the author has very deftly maintained a simple manner of storytelling without diving into any kind of technical jargon, so the book will equally appeal to readers who are not from a scientific background.
I should mention a few doubts my reading experience left about some aspects of the story. I felt that as the senior post-doctoral fellow in Pam’s lab, George could have played a more significant role. Also, the methods Pam applied to clear her name were certainly not very ethical. Could there be any other way out of the mess that did not involve an ex-FBI boyfriend? Jake, Pam’s boyfriend was portrayed merely as a loving and helpful companion with no other distinct character traits. Also, the ending was pretty predictable and seemed a bit abrupt. In my opinion, these were some of the areas the author could have explored differently.
Having said all these, I rate this book a 4 out of 4 stars. It not only has a gripping storyline but seems to be professionally edited as well. I would recommend it to anyone who loves thrillers. As a researcher, I have either encountered or have learned about a few instances of unfairness, unjust politics and unethical choices. These have made me question if research is merely a tool to gain name, fame, and recognition. Kudos to Dr. Cooper for raising such critical and thought-provoking questions! I am looking forward to more books from him.
******
The Prize
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon | on iTunes
Like Shrabastee's review? Post a comment saying so!

4 out of 4 stars
Share This Review
In his debut novel The Prize, the author Geoffrey M. Cooper brings forth a chilling tale. Dr. Pamela Weller, an up-and-coming young scientist and Dr. Eric Prescott, winner of the prestigious Lasker Award and a likely candidate for the Nobel Prize are both determined to find a cure for Alzheimer’s disease. In spite of the same end goal, their motivations are quite different. One wants to put an end to the disease, while the other is lured by the worldwide fame such a ground-breaking discovery would inevitably bring. As Pamela nears the goal, Eric cooks up devious schemes to humiliate her and steal all the glory. How can Pam prove herself innocent when even her trusted scholars, mentors and well-wishers have turned against her?
Before saying anything else, I must first convey my thanks to the author for showing a true picture of the cut-throat competition for novel discoveries that is very common in the scientific world. He shows us how even a highly accomplished and respected personality of the scientific community can lose his morality and scientific ethics when obsessed with fame and glory. He even loses basic humanity, sinking lower and lower, all to achieve just an award.
I found the plot development to be unique. For the first time, I encountered a book where pretty much everything depended on whether a scientific experiment had been designed in a way so as to cover all the loopholes. As a young researcher myself, it was interesting to see how the experimental set-ups employed to identify the anti-Alzheimer's drug without any doubt could end up being detrimental to Pam’s career. In my opinion, this plot showed Dr. Cooper in his element as a renowned professor. Also, indexing the chapters by dates instead of chapter numbers was a clever way to show the timeline.
The title and the cover of the book require special mention. The title can have myriad implications. What might a scientist consider as a prize - a chance to put his/her research for the greater good by finding a cure for a deadly disease? Or can the Nobel Prize be considered as the ultimate honor for a researcher, even if it comes at a cost of his/her moral values? A question to ponder over!
While I admit that a book should never be judged by its cover, the cover picture of this book seemed a symbolic one. The woman in the white lab coat might be running towards fame, or alternatively, towards truth. It certainly created a powerful first image about the theme.
The character portrayals were mostly real. Pam showed strong moral character and good judgment, undaunted even in the face of dire situations. Eric was the polar opposite of her in being greedy, ruthless and unscrupulous. The hypocrisy and opportunistic behavior of the Director of Langmere Institute, sadly, rang true. However, the character that appealed to me the most was that of Holly, Pam's postdoctoral student. She made a number of wrong choices, but those were driven partly by the frustration and insecurity she felt and partly by her greed. I could sympathize with that young researcher even though she went for desperate measures.
I felt at ease while reading the book since the day-to-day laboratory works, types of equipment or student curriculum the author mentioned were familiar to me. The rigorous selection procedure required for the tenure and the proceedings to deal with scientific fraud were enlightening to read. At the same time, I have to admit that the author has very deftly maintained a simple manner of storytelling without diving into any kind of technical jargon, so the book will equally appeal to readers who are not from a scientific background.
I should mention a few doubts my reading experience left about some aspects of the story. I felt that as the senior post-doctoral fellow in Pam’s lab, George could have played a more significant role. Also, the methods Pam applied to clear her name were certainly not very ethical. Could there be any other way out of the mess that did not involve an ex-FBI boyfriend? Jake, Pam’s boyfriend was portrayed merely as a loving and helpful companion with no other distinct character traits. Also, the ending was pretty predictable and seemed a bit abrupt. In my opinion, these were some of the areas the author could have explored differently.
Having said all these, I rate this book a 4 out of 4 stars. It not only has a gripping storyline but seems to be professionally edited as well. I would recommend it to anyone who loves thrillers. As a researcher, I have either encountered or have learned about a few instances of unfairness, unjust politics and unethical choices. These have made me question if research is merely a tool to gain name, fame, and recognition. Kudos to Dr. Cooper for raising such critical and thought-provoking questions! I am looking forward to more books from him.
******
The Prize
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon | on iTunes
Like Shrabastee's review? Post a comment saying so!