Do you question the existence of God?
- Khaya
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 21 Oct 2016, 23:17
- Currently Reading: 1Q84
- Bookshelf Size: 21
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khaya.html
- Latest Review: "The Nobel Prize" by Mois benarroch
Re: Do you question the existence of God?
Interestingly, I just started reading the Philosopher Charles Peirce's "The Fixation of Belief" today, and I was amazed at how relevant it is to this discussion. It's about the four different mental processes people use to determine why and how they form their beliefs. One is the method of authority. I recommend you read it. Peirce points out that "doubt is an uneasy and dissatisfied state from which we struggle to free ourselves and pass into a state of belief; while belief is a calm and satisfactory state which we do not wish to avoid, or to change to a belief in anything else." Here is an article about the method of tenacity, which I think is the most insightful. Note that the term "inquiry" in the reading means the struggling and figuring out of what to believe.
Reason: linking to a blog
- jimthorne2
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Apr 2017, 20:16
- Favorite Book: Christians in the Age of Outrage
- Currently Reading: 30th Century: Escape (First Edition)
- Bookshelf Size: 165
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jimthorne2.html
- Latest Review: California: On the Edge of American History by Ronald Genini
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Khaya
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 21 Oct 2016, 23:17
- Currently Reading: 1Q84
- Bookshelf Size: 21
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khaya.html
- Latest Review: "The Nobel Prize" by Mois benarroch
Oh, I didn't realize we weren't able to send external links, I thought we just couldn't do self promotion. Well, it's (removed by mod). I hope I'm allowed to say that much.
- jimthorne2
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Apr 2017, 20:16
- Favorite Book: Christians in the Age of Outrage
- Currently Reading: 30th Century: Escape (First Edition)
- Bookshelf Size: 165
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jimthorne2.html
- Latest Review: California: On the Edge of American History by Ronald Genini
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Khaya
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 21 Oct 2016, 23:17
- Currently Reading: 1Q84
- Bookshelf Size: 21
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khaya.html
- Latest Review: "The Nobel Prize" by Mois benarroch
Do you mean if I have a problem with His authority? God's? He is the greatest authority and knows everything, so you should do and believe what he says. Well... if that's what you mean, I don't understand why I'd be asked that. Because as I said before, I'm not confident that there's a god in the first place, let alone the God described in the Bible.
Or, do you mean if I have a problem with the method of authority when deciding what beliefs to take on? Yes, I believe that's an out-dated way of thinking of things. Here's a quote from an ethics history book. 'John Milton and later enlightenment scholars challenged the medieval view that truth existed out there and is revealed by God or other authority figures. Rather, enlightenment scholars advocated using intellect, judgment, and basic senses to discover what is true and what isn't. They gave birth to ideas of democracy and rational government, and to the scientific method-- truths are perceived by senses and intellect. They are discovered, rational, verifiable, recorded, and replicatable."
- Harmony Hills
- Posts: 226
- Joined: 30 May 2017, 06:36
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 0734">Anne of Green Gables</a>
- Bookshelf Size: 60
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-harmony-hills.html
- Latest Review: "Alba" by B. E. Okoh

- bwarthur
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 26 Jun 2017, 03:28
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- jimthorne2
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Apr 2017, 20:16
- Favorite Book: Christians in the Age of Outrage
- Currently Reading: 30th Century: Escape (First Edition)
- Bookshelf Size: 165
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jimthorne2.html
- Latest Review: California: On the Edge of American History by Ronald Genini
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Marylynn
- Posts: 131
- Joined: 24 Apr 2017, 08:05
- Bookshelf Size: 24
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-marylynn.html
- Latest Review: "McDowell" by William H. Coles
- Ayosinmi
- Posts: 393
- Joined: 15 Jun 2017, 12:34
- Bookshelf Size: 109
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ayosinmi.html
- Latest Review: "A Nation Divided" by Anthony R. Flagg
I see the hills and mountains, I watch the clouds and the elements.
I see animals in different forms and shapes.
I see humans in their entirety.
Unless someone can point out to me that he made all these things, if not, I know of a fact that God is God. Nothing to question.
Voltaire, 1694-1778
- Khaya
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 21 Oct 2016, 23:17
- Currently Reading: 1Q84
- Bookshelf Size: 21
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khaya.html
- Latest Review: "The Nobel Prize" by Mois benarroch
I'm sorry if I stirred you up a little with my constant disagreement. I haven't been fully sure, but I've been getting hints of... prickliness? from you. It's just that I believe opinions should go through the falsification process, because we can't know for sure what is true, but we can know what's false. However, practically everyone has some degree of ego and pride in what they say, so constant disagreement and flaw finding can make them upset. I think from now on, I should practice having a certain amount of times I can point out the flaw in an opinion, like three, and if it becomes more that that I should retreat from the conversation.
And again I could be wrong, but being in this discussion for a while now, I've gotten the impression that you feel contempt for people that have different beliefs and a different way of thinking than your own. I'm not trying to insult you. This impression started to form because sometimes in this topic, when someone said they're not sure if God exists, or don't believe God exists, you replied negatively. Not in a sense of disagreeing with them and showing them why you think they're wrong and you're right, but just demeaning them and disagreeing to disagree. For example, in response to someone who explained why they're an agnostic, your response was "There is no way to know anything. This is beyond skepticism. It is agnosticism. Better understand as I refuse to know anything." What if someone said, Christians who don't believe in scientific theories "That is beyond skepticism. It is Christianity. Better understand as I refuse to know anything." Again, I'm not trying to insult you, I'm just hoping by bring this to your attention, you'll tweak this behavior. Another example is when I mentioned Buddhists have spirituality but don't believe in a God, you were quick to dismiss the beliefs of the religion without knowing more about it, saying Buddhist worship their spiritual selves.
Should we quickly dismiss a different belief with scrutiny without knowing their side? I was a Christian for about 15 years, went to church practically every Sunday, and went to a Catholic high school. I've studied the Bible, and though many modern day Christians believe in practicing tolerance because they see the morality of it, I've only really seen passages in the bible that call for intolerance and religious exclusivity. This is one of the reasons I changed my belief. If someone believes something different or has a different way of thinking, and it's not bringing harm to anyone, why show contempt? Because it's not your way of thinking? Can't we be compassionate and tolerant? We're all people figuring out life.
- jimthorne2
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Apr 2017, 20:16
- Favorite Book: Christians in the Age of Outrage
- Currently Reading: 30th Century: Escape (First Edition)
- Bookshelf Size: 165
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jimthorne2.html
- Latest Review: California: On the Edge of American History by Ronald Genini
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
- Khaya
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 21 Oct 2016, 23:17
- Currently Reading: 1Q84
- Bookshelf Size: 21
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-khaya.html
- Latest Review: "The Nobel Prize" by Mois benarroch
I think this is when I should cut the discussion and respectfully retreat. I'm sorry for my excessive explaining and fault finding, and thinking I'm in the right when perhaps I'm wrong.
- Thomas Zman
- Posts: 5
- Joined: 13 Jun 2017, 11:24
- Favorite Book: <a href="http://forums.onlinebookclub.org/shelve ... 9418">From Whence They Came</a>
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 11
- jimthorne2
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 16 Apr 2017, 20:16
- Favorite Book: Christians in the Age of Outrage
- Currently Reading: 30th Century: Escape (First Edition)
- Bookshelf Size: 165
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jimthorne2.html
- Latest Review: California: On the Edge of American History by Ronald Genini
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU