Page 1 of 1

Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 17 Nov 2018, 14:22
by CBCollinsReview
It seems that more and more authors are shifting to writing trilogies and series as opposed to standalone books. While this helps to increase readership loyalty and demand for future installments, it isn't always the best move in regards to the story. Do you think this is the case with Apollo's Raven?

Personally, I feel the story should have been broken up in two books instead of three. While only the trilogy is not complete, I think that the first third was dragged out more than it should have been. If more action was incorporated in the first novel, I would have been more excited about the upcoming stories in the series.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 27 Nov 2018, 11:09
by LikoLovesBooks
The author has the second book already out that you can get on Amazon. I'm not sure if she is making it a trilogy or not, I didn't see any inkling of a third book on Goodreads, but it's not a stand alone. I'm actually really curious to see what is going to happen with Catrin and Marcellus. I feel like their relationship was left on a cliffhanger and I want their ship to sail!

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 27 Nov 2018, 15:41
by Linnea Tanner
The Curse of Clansmen and Kings was originally envisioned as a trilogy but has been expanded to a 5-part series, spanning from 24 AD to 40 AD to the time of Caligula. One of the difficult aspects of writing the series is weaving the arc of each book into the overall storyline and theme of the series so there is clarity on the political intrigue and various characters. If readers are invested in story of Catrin and Marcellus, the books below are anticipated to be released approximately one year apart:

Book 2: Dagger's Destiny (Released 9/26/18)--A Celtic warrior princess accused of treason for aiding her enemy Roman lover must win back her father’s love and trust

Book 3: Amulet's Rapture--Can an enslaved Celtic warrior princess balance her forbidden love for a Roman nobleman and her destiny to regain her freedom and to retake her kingdom as a warrior queen.

Book 4: Skulls' Vengeance--A Celtic warrior queen and her Roman lover join forces to avenge their enemies and rise to power in each of their respective nations.

Book 5: Raven's Sacrifice--A Celtic warrior queen and Roman lover must make the ultimate sacrifice to save their families from the forces of political corruption.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 28 Nov 2018, 12:16
by Gotyourbakula
I totally agree. I think a lot of books (The Magicians, Divergent) would have been better as stand alone stories. Just because you want to write a trilogy doesn't mean you have enough plot to make it work. I wish more writers would ask readers what they want.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 30 Nov 2018, 11:09
by Arup343
If you notice, there is already the second book of this novel. Personally, I am always inclined towards trilogy than stand-alone books. I can never digest the fact that the story ended in such a small book! So, from my point of view, I would see this story to be better as a trilogy! :D

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 06 Mar 2019, 10:02
by mamilla93
This story has a lot of potential and has a good chance at being a better as a trilogy than a standalone book. I just finished reading the first book and cant wait to start with the next book.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 21 Mar 2019, 17:44
by sush_destiny
I like it better as a trilogy than a standalone book. The story has potential and I am really interested in seeing how Catrin's romance turns out.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 03 Dec 2019, 11:17
by winecellarlibrary
The series has actually expanded to five promised books! There was a lot left unresolved in the first book, which leaves tons of material for subsequent books. There was way too much going on in the first book to wrap it up in a single installment. It would have ended up much too long.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 15 May 2020, 15:28
by Julie-p
I have no problem with series with more than one book. Only when the sequels are something that has feels useless to the plot. I guess sometimes authors think that a three shorter books are more likely to attract attention than one huge book (after all people that don't read much usually dislike a book with a lot of pages).
In my opinion the author didn't make a wrong decision by making it a trilogy.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 20 Feb 2021, 11:58
by Rayah Raouf
Currently, there should be 5 books in the series. However, I don't like getting involved in a long series unless I'm hooked. If the series were only 3 books I wouldn't mind completing it.

Re: Is This Story Better as a Trilogy or a Stand Alone?

Posted: 10 Dec 2022, 15:05
by photosynthesis19
I personally think that this story does very well as a series. I'm currently on book 3 of 5, and am still as invested as when I started reading the first book. In fact, book series are one of my favorite aspects of the fantasy genre (such as Harry Potter, Eragon, Lord of the Rings), as it allows the author to expand on all aspects of the story and create a more immersive reading experience.