Page 3 of 3

Re: Paul and Rachelle: yay or nay?

Posted: 28 Feb 2019, 07:30
by Dic45ta
It was too forced with little chemistry. Nevertheless yay! to it since it spiced up the story.

Re: Paul and Rachelle: yay or nay?

Posted: 27 Mar 2019, 08:43
by Bluebird03
I think the fact that many of their interactions did fall flat added to the tension of the story. Also, their relationship's ups and downs added to the plot, especially once "her" tweets began surfacing.

Re: Paul and Rachelle: yay or nay?

Posted: 20 Apr 2019, 07:58
by Connie Otwani
I thought they weren't so invested in it. I got tired of their indecision and feet dragging. But maybe this did help move the plot forward.

Re: Paul and Rachelle: yay or nay?

Posted: 15 May 2019, 16:53
by Essie_Reviews
Two characters whose chemistry is defined by how much they can't make it work? I'd love to know where that makes sense. I know the author thought it created tension-- tension they hoped the reader would enjoy, but overcomplicated relations are never a yay. Mostly tedious unfortunately.

Re: Paul and Rachelle: yay or nay?

Posted: 28 Jun 2022, 16:50
by Moneybag
Yay! Their relationship really spiced up the story.

Re: Paul and Rachelle: yay or nay?

Posted: 05 Jul 2022, 06:43
by Agbata precious
Ursadsong wrote: 04 Dec 2018, 16:17 I think it's a yay! Their relationship add something in the whole story. But I also think that it was kind of too much.
I will go with this, you hit the point.