ARA Review by Alan Zimm of The Scribe

The ARA Review Exchange is a system in which authors review other authors' books, generlaly in exchange for getting their own book reviews by other authors. However, the person who reviews a author's book is not the same person whose book that author reviewed. This way, author reviews do not influence each other, such as by an author being inclined to reward a good review by deliving one in return or deliver a negative review as revenge.

Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives

Forum rules
Authors and publishers are not able to post replies in the review topics.
Post Reply
Alan Zimm
In It Together VIP
Posts: 2
Joined: 01 Jul 2022, 13:49
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 0

ARA Review by Alan Zimm of The Scribe

Post by Alan Zimm »

[Following is an OnlineBookClub.org ARA Review of the book, The Scribe.]
Book Cover
1 out of 5 stars
Share This Review


This is a review of The Scribe , by Liam Robert Mullen, and a difficult review it was to write. I enjoy historical novels and respect the Bible. This novel does not do justice to either.
Summary: this book is a novelization of the life of Luke the Evangelist, along with a random supporting cast of characters and a few glimpses at Jesus Himself. The premise is intriguing, but the execution execrable.

Positive: the author has a number of publication credits listed on Amazon. Most appear to be less than 70 pages, mostly e-books self-published, and the most popular appeared to have only 17 reviews.

Negative: the horror was fully exposed by page 16 of this 135-page, 8.5 x 11 format novel. I had difficulties with the author’s writing style, the story progression, and the historical accuracy.
Writing Style: one struggles to understanding his English, on several counts. First, he avoids the proper use of commas. Often, I would read a sentence, then was forced to reread it several times to discern which subordinate clause is associated with which subject. Yes, he often has several subjects contained in one sentence. Second, the author has an absolute love affair with dangling participles, sentence fragments, and ending sentences with prepositions. Third, clichés abound, like “uphill struggle.” Fourth, adjectives and verbs are repeated within paragraphs, things like, “struggling to catch their breaths. They were wet and cold. Struggling ashore …” Fifth, the voice of the narration changes without warning. One sentence comes from the point of view of a character, the next sentence that of a modern-times narrator, then back to who-knows-who. The author often loses track of who he is talking about. For example, in talking about the baby Moses, here’s a typical sentence: “The discovery of his real identity and left stranded in the desert to die.”

Story Progression: the sequence of the story was most confusing. It begins with the crucifixion. Chapter Two regresses to 11 AD and Chapter Three to 20 AD. It bounces back and forth, without continuity.

Historical Accuracy: Historical novels ought to be historically accurate, not so? In this book, not so. There are places where modern expressions are used, such as “wind shear” and “damage control,” expressions you will not find in the period. The author also did not keep track of his history. A main character bemoans that “Rome could be harsh to … Christians,” this stated close to the birth of Luke the Evangelist, 20+ years before there were any Christians! The Slaughter of the Innocents, that occurred after the birth of Christ, Mullen specifically dates at 5 BC. According to the Author, the Mediterranean is located to the EAST of the Sea of Galilea. As for Roman society, Mullen has not read his Livy or Cicero. He does not know the correct name for the “commander of ten cohorts.” He does not understand the marriage customs of the Senatorial class. Marriages among aristocrats were arranged by the heads of the families. Mullen has his lovers taking long walks in the sunset and other things that absolutely did NOT happen in upper-class Roman society. Then, in the center of the book, to the horror of geography fans, he describes a trip to the north in a cart. The Alps. Does Mullen not know that it is about 500 road miles from Rome to the Alps, and that at a good pace of 15 miles a day by cart, that would come to 33 travel days, one way? That arduous trip was described in lighthearted terms, as if it was a Viking cruise ship tour, even if they managed to avoid the loving attentions of the Goths. Then there was the character of “The Seer,” who apparently hands out predictions of the future to Roman aristocrats and Christians indiscriminately. Why would Mullen have his Christian characters seek out a soothsayer? Leviticus 19:31 says, “Do not turn to mediums or necromancers; do not seek them out, and so make yourselves unclean by them: I am the LORD your God.”

Rating: I rate this book 1 out of 5 Stars . I cannot give it 2 stars, due to the grammatical and historical errors that cause the reader to continually stop reading and marvel that the author actually wanted to see this mess published, with his own money. The cover is nice. However, were I to make a recommendation to the author, I would advise him to first spend the money on a good editor and a beta reader versed in history and the Bible.

***
View The Scribe on Bookshelves
User avatar
dublinwriter
In It Together VIP
Posts: 3
Joined: 07 Aug 2019, 01:04
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 7

Post by dublinwriter »

Thanks for your insights and interest. I’ll revisit some of these.

Regards Liam
Post Reply

Return to “ARA Reviews (Authors Reviewing Authors)”