Dennison and Sadism

Use this forum to discuss the April 2020 Book of the month, "Project Tau" by Jude Austin
User avatar
Ferdinand_Otieno
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 3369
Joined: 03 Jun 2017, 12:54
Favorite Author: Victor Rose
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 1749
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ferdinand-otieno.html
Latest Review: Zona: The Forbidden Land by Fred G. Baker
fav_author_id: 78026

Dennison and Sadism

Post by Ferdinand_Otieno »

Dennison was the unspoken main antagonist in the story due to his love for sadistic torture and how eager he was for the Pain Acclimation treatment. I always seemed to hate him whenever he was mentioned in the plot.
Was he, in your opinion, the main antagonist or most dangerous antagonist in the plot?
User avatar
Brenda Creech
Previous Member of the Month
Posts: 3382
Joined: 09 Mar 2019, 13:34
Favorite Author: Mary Pat Ferron Caines
Favorite Book: The Reel Sisters
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 356
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-brenda-creech.html
Latest Review: Was She Crying for Me? by Jerry Hyde
fav_author_id: 253250

Post by Brenda Creech »

In my opinion, Dennison was both the main antagonist and the most dangerous one. And he was definitely sadistic!
B. Creech
"Like beauty in the eyes, the divinity of the rose may be in the nose that smells it, and the lover that beholds it." Eckhart Aurelius Hughes
User avatar
Tavaiel26
Posts: 211
Joined: 09 Jan 2020, 11:49
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 33
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-tavaiel26.html
Latest Review: We are Voulhire: The Fires of Virko by Matthew Tysz

Post by Tavaiel26 »

Agree with B Creech on Dennison, but as the quote says “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” everyone who stood by and did nothing, and the system (and company) that allowed Dennison to thrive, were also responsible.
Elmaestro
Posts: 89
Joined: 27 Jun 2017, 14:05
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 24
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-elmaestro.html
Latest Review: Let’s Mountain Bike! by Paul Molenberg

Post by Elmaestro »

I tend to agree Dennison was the antagonist with the way he carried himself.. And he was purely sadistic!
leximutia
Posts: 212
Joined: 04 Mar 2020, 16:39
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-leximutia.html
Latest Review: The Hand Bringer by Christopher J. Penington

Post by leximutia »

I would call him one of the most present antagonists in the book for sure, even Mason is technically the head of the facility. I grew to really despise Dennison, not just for his sadistic tendencies and his torture of Tau and Kata, but also for the role he played in the death of Reinfield and for the horrible sexual assault towards Tau. When that came to light in the story, I was absolutely furious. Afterall, Tau is essentially a child, at least in terms of mental maturity.
User avatar
DEEPA PUJARI
Posts: 1327
Joined: 28 Jan 2020, 10:52
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 60
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-deepa-pujari.html
Latest Review: Seemore the Seagull by Ralph Tufo
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by DEEPA PUJARI »

I think both Dennison and Mason were sadistic and the main antagonist in the story.
Nzube Chizoba Okeke
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 1090
Joined: 15 Sep 2019, 11:12
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 442
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nzube-chizoba-okeke.html
Latest Review: Chrome Mountain by Ben Schneider

Post by Nzube Chizoba Okeke »

Tavaiel26 wrote: 03 Apr 2020, 11:41 Agree with B Creech on Dennison, but as the quote says “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.” everyone who stood by and did nothing, and the system (and company) that allowed Dennison to thrive, were also responsible.
So true! Going by this all those who stood by and did nothing are equally antagonists but Dennison stood out. So in my opinion, Dennison was the most dangerous antagonist.
User avatar
vermontelf
Posts: 221
Joined: 08 Jan 2014, 17:05
Currently Reading: The faerie wand
Bookshelf Size: 83
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-vermontelf.html
Latest Review: The Follower by L. Hillis

Post by vermontelf »

Arguably humanity's tendencies to stand by and watch atrocities happen even when they seem wrong could be the main antagonist. However, I fully felt Dennison was the nastiest sadist of the book. Mason, came close behind even though he hardly got his hands dirty, he was the mastermind behind the kidnapping and cover-up.

After I finished the book, I reread (skimmed) the beginning and it seems that Dennison doesn't actually think they abused the projects at all. Yet through the book, I read about how he enjoyed torturing them...a little confusingly inconsistent.
User avatar
Odette Chace
Posts: 518
Joined: 22 Feb 2020, 16:22
Favorite Book: The History of Love
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 576
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-odette-chace.html
Latest Review: Everyday Pocket Poetry by LoAnn Twedt

Post by Odette Chace »

vermontelf wrote: 07 Apr 2020, 12:52 Arguably humanity's tendencies to stand by and watch atrocities happen even when they seem wrong could be the main antagonist. However, I fully felt Dennison was the nastiest sadist of the book. Mason, came close behind even though he hardly got his hands dirty, he was the mastermind behind the kidnapping and cover-up.

After I finished the book, I reread (skimmed) the beginning and it seems that Dennison doesn't actually think they abused the projects at all. Yet through the book, I read about how he enjoyed torturing them...a little confusingly inconsistent.
I agree 100%. I reread the opening chapter after I finished the book and it seemed like Dennison had a severe case of split personality. He was so cruel to the Projects and insufferable to his colleagues. Yet, when I first read the first chapter, I thought he was going to be a character that I really liked as I appreciated his sarcasm and exasperation with Mason. I believe his cruelty stemmed from the need be in control of everyone around him and he was fully aware that the Projects could wipe the floor with him if they weren't beaten to within an inch of their lives.
User avatar
Jude Austin
Posts: 447
Joined: 16 Feb 2018, 08:10
Favorite Book:
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 33
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jude-austin.html
Latest Review: The Palm Reader by Christopher Bowron

Post by Jude Austin »

Odette Chace wrote: 11 Apr 2020, 15:53
vermontelf wrote: 07 Apr 2020, 12:52 After I finished the book, I reread (skimmed) the beginning and it seems that Dennison doesn't actually think they abused the projects at all. Yet through the book, I read about how he enjoyed torturing them...a little confusingly inconsistent.
I agree 100%. I reread the opening chapter after I finished the book and it seemed like Dennison had a severe case of split personality. He was so cruel to the Projects and insufferable to his colleagues. Yet, when I first read the first chapter, I thought he was going to be a character that I really liked as I appreciated his sarcasm and exasperation with Mason.
Small point here: Dennison isn't going to speak to his boss in the same manner he speaks to his colleagues or to the Projects ;)

Plus, I think the important word here is "Dennison doesn't actually think." :wink: He's not exactly the most reliable narrator in this case; how many abusers or bullies genuinely believe that what they're doing to their victims is abuse? How many times does abuse go undiscovered for years, because the people responsible seem so much like regular, normal people to those on the outside?

They deny their actions (it's just part of the job, "You're wrong, Project Kata; I don't enjoy hurting you.") they blame the victim (it's Kata/Tau's own fault for not obeying quickly enough) they have to be in complete control (oh, so very much!) and they can react very badly to being directly called on their actions (one of the few times Dennison actually attacks Kalin himself with his fists instead of using the handlers to shock him is just after the above line, when Kalin's response is a flat, "Liar.")

In Dennison's mind, abuse would constitute hurting the Projects for no other reason than his own gratification. We know from Renfield in Chapter 10 that pain acclimation is standard for all Projects in preparation for being sold. (""The sessions exist because Tau's new owner might want to punish him. Projects have to be trained to accept punishment of all kinds without fighting it.") This is further supported by the fact that none of the other scientists have a problem with Tau's treatment until Dennison actually takes it to the point of allowing him to be sexually assaulted.

In other words, pain acclimation is a required part of breaking and training all Projects, therefore - to Dennison - it doesn't constitute abuse. The fact that he does get his kicks from it is neither here nor there; he didn't come up with pain acclimation sessions, they just happen to be the part of his job that he loves most, which is why he takes it much, much too far, using the excuse of Just Doing My Job to justify some truly reprehensible acts.

(All that said, the Extended Prologue does give a lot more foreshadowing ;) )
funninessishappiness
Posts: 32
Joined: 29 Mar 2020, 20:27
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 11
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-funninessishappiness.html
Latest Review: Project Tau by Jude Austin

Post by funninessishappiness »

DEEPA PUJARI wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 15:15 I think both Dennison and Mason were sadistic and the main antagonist in the story.
I agree with you on Dennison, but how is Mason a sadist? I don't see him as a sadist, I see him as more of a narcissistic idiot. It is true that he never stopped what was happening to the projects, but a lot of other people that worked at GenTech didn't either. I wouldn't classify them as sadists, just people that don't stand up to others. While Mason did have the power to control Dennison, he didn't. He let it happen. However, I am not so sure he knew about everything going on either. I don't think he knew about Dennison sexually assaulting the Project. Mason did state that he didn't want the projects to be put under any unnecessary pain. Even so, many times throughout the book it was stated that what pain was necessary and unnecessary was controlled by GenTech. I don't know if I would consider him a sadist. He is definitely an awful person. He tricked Kalin and made him sign his life away. From what I understood though, the main reason he seemed to do that was for money. Sadists usually do things from the pleasure they get from hurting others, but Mason seems to get more pleasure from himself and money than hurting others.
Jocelyn Eastman
Posts: 179
Joined: 26 Jan 2020, 14:49
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 49
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jocelyn-eastman.html
Latest Review: Phoenix by Patricia Simpson

Post by Jocelyn Eastman »

Dennison was definitely a sadist, but I wouldn’t say he was the most dangerous person in the story. I think the most dangerous person in the story is Kata.
User avatar
raindropreader
Posts: 55
Joined: 18 Mar 2020, 14:00
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by raindropreader »

funninessishappiness wrote: 12 Apr 2020, 21:43
DEEPA PUJARI wrote: 06 Apr 2020, 15:15 I think both Dennison and Mason were sadistic and the main antagonist in the story.
I agree with you on Dennison, but how is Mason a sadist? I don't see him as a sadist, I see him as more of a narcissistic idiot. It is true that he never stopped what was happening to the projects, but a lot of other people that worked at GenTech didn't either. I wouldn't classify them as sadists, just people that don't stand up to others. While Mason did have the power to control Dennison, he didn't. He let it happen. However, I am not so sure he knew about everything going on either. I don't think he knew about Dennison sexually assaulting the Project. Mason did state that he didn't want the projects to be put under any unnecessary pain. Even so, many times throughout the book it was stated that what pain was necessary and unnecessary was controlled by GenTech. I don't know if I would consider him a sadist. He is definitely an awful person. He tricked Kalin and made him sign his life away. From what I understood though, the main reason he seemed to do that was for money. Sadists usually do things from the pleasure they get from hurting others, but Mason seems to get more pleasure from himself and money than hurting others.
This is how I feel about it as well. I can’t label Mason a sadist because I didn’t get a direct sense that he enjoyed the abuse the way that I did for Dennison (on multiple occasions).
User avatar
raindropreader
Posts: 55
Joined: 18 Mar 2020, 14:00
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by raindropreader »

JudasFm wrote: 11 Apr 2020, 19:54
Odette Chace wrote: 11 Apr 2020, 15:53
vermontelf wrote: 07 Apr 2020, 12:52 After I finished the book, I reread (skimmed) the beginning and it seems that Dennison doesn't actually think they abused the projects at all. Yet through the book, I read about how he enjoyed torturing them...a little confusingly inconsistent.
I agree 100%. I reread the opening chapter after I finished the book and it seemed like Dennison had a severe case of split personality. He was so cruel to the Projects and insufferable to his colleagues. Yet, when I first read the first chapter, I thought he was going to be a character that I really liked as I appreciated his sarcasm and exasperation with Mason.
Small point here: Dennison isn't going to speak to his boss in the same manner he speaks to his colleagues or to the Projects ;)

Plus, I think the important word here is "Dennison doesn't actually think." :wink: He's not exactly the most reliable narrator in this case; how many abusers or bullies genuinely believe that what they're doing to their victims is abuse? How many times does abuse go undiscovered for years, because the people responsible seem so much like regular, normal people to those on the outside?

They deny their actions (it's just part of the job, "You're wrong, Project Kata; I don't enjoy hurting you.") they blame the victim (it's Kata/Tau's own fault for not obeying quickly enough) they have to be in complete control (oh, so very much!) and they can react very badly to being directly called on their actions (one of the few times Dennison actually attacks Kalin himself with his fists instead of using the handlers to shock him is just after the above line, when Kalin's response is a flat, "Liar.")

In Dennison's mind, abuse would constitute hurting the Projects for no other reason than his own gratification. We know from Renfield in Chapter 10 that pain acclimation is standard for all Projects in preparation for being sold. (""The sessions exist because Tau's new owner might want to punish him. Projects have to be trained to accept punishment of all kinds without fighting it.") This is further supported by the fact that none of the other scientists have a problem with Tau's treatment until Dennison actually takes it to the point of allowing him to be sexually assaulted.

In other words, pain acclimation is a required part of breaking and training all Projects, therefore - to Dennison - it doesn't constitute abuse. The fact that he does get his kicks from it is neither here nor there; he didn't come up with pain acclimation sessions, they just happen to be the part of his job that he loves most, which is why he takes it much, much too far, using the excuse of Just Doing My Job to justify some truly reprehensible acts.

(All that said, the Extended Prologue does give a lot more foreshadowing ;) )
I think you made a really good that I didn’t mention in my post. I agree that in many books I’ve read I’ve seen what we as a society would morally consider abuse be done in the name of science and experimentation. This kind of came into play here.
User avatar
raindropreader
Posts: 55
Joined: 18 Mar 2020, 14:00
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 0

Post by raindropreader »

Jocelyn Eastman wrote: 13 Apr 2020, 13:14 Dennison was definitely a sadist, but I wouldn’t say he was the most dangerous person in the story. I think the most dangerous person in the story is Kata.
I agree and honestly just because of his new powers- because of the person he was with his intelligence and cunning and also his motivations.
Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "Project Tau" by Jude Austin”