Review of TheLimits

[Aisha Yakub]

[Following is an official OnlineBookClub.org review of "TheLimits" by Dan M. Mrejeru.]

---

4 out of 5 stars

---

Share This Review

---

The author, Dan M. Mrejeru, seeks a more thorough comprehension of the surrounding nonlinear world. The Limits is a blend of philosophy, scientific writing, and psychological exploration. Mrejeru takes readers on a mind-bending journey. This book is his first work and was first drafted over ten years ago. The work explores dystopian concerns symbolically.

Does humanity have a well-marked beginning? Why do we talk about the ozone hole? Why would all humans not change at the same time? These are some of the questions asked and answered in this book. The book, filled with pictographic paintings, is divided into three parts. Part one is titled "The Limits". Part two is titled "Other Limits", and part three is titled "Mind's Enigmas". The book is filled with fantastic allegories and mentions of Tarkovsky's Solaris.

The poetic and descriptive writing style of Mrejeru creates vivid and atmospheric situations that transport readers to the worlds of insanity and reflection. To be honest, it does sound confusing at first. However, this seemed to have a way of making the texts linger in my mind for a long time. I found myself reflecting on the chapters. He captures the subtleties of emotion and intellect with extraordinary clarity in his lyrical prose. I liked how I tried to solve the puzzle of linking these pictographs to the preceding chapters.

The book examines the human situation from a philosophical perspective. Mrejeru explores the depths of human awareness and addresses existential issues with remarkable insight. I was prompted by the book to reflect on the nature of existence, the purpose of life, and the brittleness of our senses. The book is a reflective and thought-provoking read that stays in the mind long after the last page is turned.

The book's propensity for ambiguity and lack of concise explanations is one of its drawbacks. I thought it made the distinction between illusion and reality hazy. Another drawback for me was the resolution's apparent limitations. The abstract and open-ended style of the book gave me the impression that it lacked focus. The author's writing style was also rather overwhelming, although I thought it was outstanding. The author used a lot of difficult vocabulary and phrase constructions. This affected my reading experience.

I only found an error in this book, so it was professionally edited. I rate this book 4 out of 5 stars. I am deducting a star because of the negative aspects I encountered.

This thought-provoking book is highly recommended for those seeking a profound exploration of the human psyche. I recommend this book to readers seeking intellectual stimulation and a journey into the depths of human consciousness.

******
TheLimits
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon

[King Nyebuchi]

The level of ambiguity in the book as stated by you, the reviewer, may be also make it difficult for me to flow. I like the dept of this review, it's a great one indeed.

[Amy Luman]

This book does not seem to be exactly my style, but it asks some interesting questions that deserve answers. I do think that it would have been to the author’s advantage to be more precise in his explanations, though.

[Shem Murundu]

This book sounds interesting, I like its thought-provoking nature. However, too many "big" words complicate great things, and I think this would be a problem for me. The review is great, though, so big up!

[Nut Cashew]

I love how fascinating this review is and I would love to know more about this book. I love this review and I would love to read more of your reviews.

[Navera A]

Sounds like such a philosophical, intriguing book full of fascinating questions! I would love to read it sometime. Thanks for the great review!

[NetMassimo]

It seems like the author was focused mostly in the novel's philosophical and pshychological elements while other part of the plot were a bit sacrificed. It still seems interesting for the food for thought it offers. Thank you for your great review!

[Kebun Bunga]

our review of "The Limits" by Dan M. Mrejeru provides a comprehensive analysis of the book's content and impact. You begin by highlighting the author's intent to delve into the nonlinear world through a blend of philosophy, scientific writing, and psychological exploration. Noting that this is Mrejeru's first work, you acknowledge its long drafting process and symbolic exploration of dystopian concerns.

You appreciate the poetic and descriptive writing style, which creates vivid and atmospheric situations that linger in the mind. While acknowledging the initial confusion, you commend the text's ability to make a lasting impression, prompting reflection on the chapters and the puzzle of linking pictographs to the narrative. The exploration of existential issues and the depth of human awareness is seen as a thought-provoking and reflective aspect of the book.

Your critique focuses on the book's ambiguity and lack of concise explanations, which can make the distinction between illusion and reality hazy. The abstract and open-ended style, while remarkable, gives the impression of lacking focus. Additionally, the use of difficult vocabulary and phrase constructions affected your reading experience.