Page 1 of 12

Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 02 Nov 2020, 20:59
by maiiii_maii
In the story, Ron has one relationship after the other. On my part, it dampened my interest in the story. I don't think one needs multiple relationships in order to bring out the best in him. What do you guys think?

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 03 Nov 2020, 03:19
by lavkathleen
maiiii_maii wrote: 02 Nov 2020, 20:59 I don't think one needs multiple relationships in order to bring out the best in him.
I agree with this, but I don't think he went into those relationships to "bring out the best in him", though. I think it was only coincidence that he met those women and eventually got attracted to them—that's all it is. I understand that you enjoyed the book less, though. The author needs to resort to something else to make the character more interesting.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 03 Nov 2020, 15:13
by Melexa
I don't think the intention of the writer was for those multiple relationships to bring out the best in Ron. The writer might have designed Ron's character that way to simply depict life's realities; not everyone finds true love at first instance. Sometimes, we go in and out of relationships before we finally find the one that completes us.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 03 Nov 2020, 21:27
by houligan19
I did not feel that his relationships were too much or detracted from the character. It is pretty normal to have multiple relationships through life, and I thought that the way they added to his character was very interesting. I especially liked Cheryl and the lessons she taught him.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 04 Nov 2020, 05:58
by Marty_Kelly
I think the many relationships, in a way, contributes to Ron's character because all those relationships were initiated by the ladies. This reflects to some extent his lack of control/direction/focus in many aspects of his life.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 04 Nov 2020, 18:23
by EnobongGold
I may not know exactly why he had multiple relationships, or if it is in his character to do so. I don't also want to judge him, but in his case here I would say he was extremely lucky because he became successful in these relationship. Another person that tries this may not be lucky, having multiple relationships is not a good thing so I don't subscribe to it.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 04 Nov 2020, 18:43
by EnobongGold
I would say Ron had no self discipline.
One being successful does not depend on the number of relationships one keeps

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 04 Nov 2020, 21:12
by Ari Martinez
I usually don't like it when a character has multiple relationships, especially when they bring no character growth, which is the case in this book, so it's no surprise that I didn't like it. However, I understand that having relationships is a natural thing in real-life, so why not bring it into a book too?

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 05 Nov 2020, 01:52
by Joseph_ngaruiya
maiiii_maii wrote: 02 Nov 2020, 20:59 In the story, Ron has one relationship after the other. On my part, it dampened my interest in the story. I don't think one needs multiple relationships in order to bring out the best in him. What do you guys think?
I wouldn't say Ron is engaged in multiple serious relationship. He was never into it that deep, not until he had a project in mind where he met his business mentor. He might have had an interest in different women but not to a fruitful extent.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 05 Nov 2020, 01:58
by Joseph_ngaruiya
lavkathleen wrote: 03 Nov 2020, 03:19
maiiii_maii wrote: 02 Nov 2020, 20:59 I don't think one needs multiple relationships in order to bring out the best in him.
I agree with this, but I don't think he went into those relationships to "bring out the best in him", though. I think it was only coincidence that he met those women and eventually got attracted to them—that's all it is. I understand that you enjoyed the book less, though. The author needs to resort to something else to make the character more interesting.
Ron must have been naive in the beginning. He always wanted something or someone to connect with. And as an orphan he was lacking in attention and loneliness was a constant issue. I think this is the reason he clings so fast to whoever he meets. Do you have a different opinion?

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 05 Nov 2020, 07:37
by Muvokav
I agree with this, but I don't think he went into those relationships to "bring out the best in him". I also understand that even in real life not everyone finds "the one" on one try , so I can not fault him for this. Ron's numerous relationships did not make me enjoy the book any less.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 05 Nov 2020, 11:52
by Joseph_ngaruiya
Muvokav wrote: 05 Nov 2020, 07:37 I agree with this, but I don't think he went into those relationships to "bring out the best in him". I also understand that even in real life not everyone finds "the one" on one try , so I can not fault him for this. Ron's numerous relationships did not make me enjoy the book any less.
I believe the multiple interactions revealed Ron's true nature and his behavior towards those he had love for, made the narrative interesting. I cannot find anything wrong with the relationships, what fascinated me is how fast he fell in love. The occasion where he meets Regina ends up with him falling in love.

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 05 Nov 2020, 19:30
by Valerie Garske
I liked that the book had an aspect of romance. I think it made Ron more vulnerable and believable. Over 15 years, it was not that many women. He also respected his marriage vows, so the relationships were positive.
~ Valerie

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 05 Nov 2020, 21:47
by lavkathleen
Joseph_ngaruiya wrote: 05 Nov 2020, 01:58
lavkathleen wrote: 03 Nov 2020, 03:19
maiiii_maii wrote: 02 Nov 2020, 20:59 I don't think one needs multiple relationships in order to bring out the best in him.
I agree with this, but I don't think he went into those relationships to "bring out the best in him", though. I think it was only coincidence that he met those women and eventually got attracted to them—that's all it is. I understand that you enjoyed the book less, though. The author needs to resort to something else to make the character more interesting.
Ron must have been naive in the beginning. He always wanted something or someone to connect with. And as an orphan he was lacking in attention and loneliness was a constant issue. I think this is the reason he clings so fast to whoever he meets. Do you have a different opinion?
I haven't thought of it that way, but I agree with you—it makes sense. Now that you mentioned it, I realized I can relate with Ron a little. But then again, don't we all need and crave that connection with someone?

Re: Do you like how Ron has had multiple relationships? Why or why not?

Posted: 06 Nov 2020, 23:23
by Joseph_ngaruiya
valeriejane wrote: 05 Nov 2020, 19:30 I liked that the book had an aspect of romance. I think it made Ron more vulnerable and believable. Over 15 years, it was not that many women. He also respected his marriage vows, so the relationships were positive.
~ Valerie
What I didn't like as much was the fact that Ron didn't fall in love with Regina. He had a crash on her when they first met but his zeal diminished with time. Part of the reason he is able to stand up into a real relationship with Sheila is because of his improved self awarenesses. I also agree that the relationships weren't numerous.