Is it okay to compare and contrast science and religion?
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: The Stylite
- Bookshelf Size: 443
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Re: Is it okay to compare and contrast science and religion?
We can do that. We can look at various things from a scientific point of view as from a religious point of view. But once again the ultimate result will be a comparison between science and religion. When these two are applied to same thing, there can be agreement as well as disagreement. Disagreement can cause unnecessary clash between the two. So, finally, I believe that such comparison is unnecessarymonicamu wrote: ↑23 Dec 2020, 01:53 I think the point is not to compare and contrast science and religion with each other, but to examine other things of interest from these two different perspectives. In this way, we should all learn something, regardless of which perspective we are most comfortable with.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: 12 Dec 2019, 18:20
- Currently Reading: Lord of the rings
- Bookshelf Size: 180
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-slj3988.html
- Latest Review: Learn to Love: Guide to Healing Your Disappointing Love Life by Thomas Jordan, Ph.D.
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: The Stylite
- Bookshelf Size: 443
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Surely it is. It is a personal thing to choose between religion and science, or bits from both. As far as you keep your opinions to yourself, there won't be any issue. But the clash occurs when someone tries to compare the two, because such a comparison will inevitability make one party superior and the other inferior. That is why I believe that such a comparison is unnecessaryslj3988 wrote: ↑23 Dec 2020, 22:25 The way I look at it is both science and religion are part of our struggle to make sense of our reality. We seek to find purpose. There's no way for us to prove or disprove what it all means. We decide for ourselves. So there's no reason anyone should find fiction or non-fiction where the two clash to be inappropriate. It's about finding your place in the world, not one judging the other. I realise certain followers of faith have strict views, as much as believers in science argue for logic. A person of science is taught to question. A person of faith is taught to accept. I think it is down to the reader how they choose to receive it.
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: The Stylite
- Bookshelf Size: 443
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
There are biblical facts that can be interpreted in ways that are palatable to the science-loving guys, but not everything can be interpreted in such a way. Most of the times when these two are compared the results have not been very pleasant. So it is better to leave them apart than trying to convergeBisqwik wrote: ↑23 Dec 2020, 15:48 When I was younger I used to preach sermons. I enjoyed it quite a lot. But I learned the hard way that some people are not okay with the idea of mixing science and religion. Even when its to make religion stronger. In my case, one example is that in the Bible it says that an eye blink to God is as a millenium to mankind. I reasoned that meant that the 7 days to create everything was in God's time. Which would mean millions of years to us. And of clay being able to be the rise of creatures from the ocean etc. That was not received well at all. There are plenty of historical issues with the Bible alone, things that don't fit or contradict. But I've always thought a marriage of both concepts was closest to the truth
- Foluso Falaye
- Posts: 154
- Joined: 26 Sep 2019, 13:05
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 26
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-foluso-falaye.html
- Latest Review: Man Mission by Eytan Uliel
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 07 Jun 2020, 07:37
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 24
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-honey1495.html
- Latest Review: The Necessity of Finance by Dr. Anthony M. Criniti IV
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: The Stylite
- Bookshelf Size: 443
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Proving your beliefs is a way that science can be make use of. Similarly it can be used to disprove someone's beliefs as well. Science is developed on hypotheses. They are being experimented and either accepted or rejected. But that is not very much applicable to religious matters since it can cause issues. So better to keep things apart from each otherFolushour wrote: ↑24 Dec 2020, 05:27 Beliefs have no boundaries. You can use anything to justify your belief. As long as you believe in something, everything else can be tweaked to prove it. I guess it depends on you as a person. Do you live by faith or facts? If you you use facts to prove the unproven side of your faith, it's still faith and not really science. Science is all facts.
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: The Stylite
- Bookshelf Size: 443
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Religious devouts can e satisfied when science confirms the religious beliefs. But what will be the result when some religious beliefs are disproved by science? That won't be a very pleasant experience to the believers and many will deny to accept. So a comparison between these two will most probably lead to unnecessary chaosHoney1495 wrote: ↑24 Dec 2020, 10:20 Religious beliefs are emotions, while science is fact. It is subjective whether using science to contrast religion is OK or not. But I find it exciting to get the scientific proof to my religious believes. It doesn't really justify my believes, rather it is satisfying to read science factualize something that I have believed without needing proof of.
- leiabutler
- Posts: 176
- Joined: 08 Apr 2019, 16:51
- Currently Reading: I Will Make of Thee a Great Nation
- Bookshelf Size: 36
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-leiabutler.html
- Latest Review: Britain Loves Baking - The Bakers Annual 2020 by Greg Wixted
The Great Gatsby
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: 16 Jun 2020, 02:37
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 34
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jb3.html
- Latest Review: Shadow Game by A.M. Adair
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: The Stylite
- Bookshelf Size: 443
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Indeed it is a difficult comparison. And in such a comparison, inevitably the strengths and weaknesses of each party will be revealed, and that won't be equally accepted by all, especially the weaknesses in a religious belief won't be well accepted by the devouts. So such a comparison will lead to nothing but chaosleiabutler wrote: ↑24 Dec 2020, 17:29 I don't think it is easy to compare them, as they are based in completely different origins and have completely different arguments. However I think it can be interesting to see where those differences and similarities are. Without the option for contrasting them, it might be harder to see the strengths and weaknesses are!
- 63tty
- Posts: 768
- Joined: 16 Oct 2020, 09:16
- Currently Reading: Killing Abel
- Bookshelf Size: 349
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-63tty.html
- Latest Review: The Maestro Monologue by Rob White
~Lily Tomlin
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 5274
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: The Stylite
- Bookshelf Size: 443
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Most of the time people will try the comparison to prove what they believe is true. No one will compare the two and disprove his/her own beliefs, unless he/she is a very open-minded one. But the problem occurs when someone tries to compare the two and use that to discredit or disprove someone else's beliefs. So it is okay to compare if you do that with a pure heart, but, if not, it is better not to compare at all63tty wrote: ↑25 Dec 2020, 05:13 I think you can compare all you want but at the end of the day, what matters is, are you content with what you believe? Whether science, the bible or both. Personally, I don't have the luxury of comparing. I think religion keeps me grounded and science is a huge part of my profession which I love. So its kind of an afair for me.
- Ahbed Nadir
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 14 Nov 2020, 02:33
- Currently Reading: Brandy, Ballad of a Pirate Princess
- Bookshelf Size: 51
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ahbed-nadir.html
- Latest Review: There's Always Tomorrow by Jim Carr
I don't agree with this at all. There's no correlation between science and religion. I mean according to science man is descended from monkeys but according to religion man was created instantaneously by God so I don't think the two can be reconciled at all.Sushan wrote: ↑22 Dec 2020, 11:00The core concepts are different when science and religion are considered. Science accepts experimentally proven facts which are objective, but the religious values the subjective facts which are based on beliefs of the devouts. So the two are parallel, but doesn't find any common ground in which they can be comparedAhbed Nadir wrote: ↑22 Dec 2020, 07:16 I'm not sure they should be compared. They are directly in contrast with each other as science deals with logic whereas religion is based off on belief.
- Maddie Atkinson
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 403
- Joined: 13 Nov 2020, 05:30
- Favorite Book: gender euphoria
- Currently Reading: The Appeal
- Bookshelf Size: 105
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-maddie-atkinson.html
- Latest Review: A King Amongst Us by A.D. Lewis
- 2025 Reading Goal: 30
- 2025 Goal Completion: 33%
That's only one example though, there are plenty of other ways that science and religion can be compared. Science can be used to prove events in the Bible!Ahbed Nadir wrote: ↑25 Dec 2020, 16:13I don't agree with this at all. There's no correlation between science and religion. I mean according to science man is descended from monkeys but according to religion man was created instantaneously by God so I don't think the two can be reconciled at all.Sushan wrote: ↑22 Dec 2020, 11:00The core concepts are different when science and religion are considered. Science accepts experimentally proven facts which are objective, but the religious values the subjective facts which are based on beliefs of the devouts. So the two are parallel, but doesn't find any common ground in which they can be comparedAhbed Nadir wrote: ↑22 Dec 2020, 07:16 I'm not sure they should be compared. They are directly in contrast with each other as science deals with logic whereas religion is based off on belief.