Is it okay to compare and contrast science and religion?

Use this forum to discuss the December 2020 Book of the month, "Wilderness Cry: A Scientific and Philosophical Approach to Understanding God and the Universe" by Hilary L Hunt M.D.
Post Reply
User avatar
Sushan Ekanayake
Official Reviewer Representative
Posts: 5274
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
Currently Reading: The Stylite
Bookshelf Size: 443
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
Reading Device: B0794JC2K5

Re: Is it okay to compare and contrast science and religion?

Post by Sushan Ekanayake »

monicamu wrote: 23 Dec 2020, 01:53 I think the point is not to compare and contrast science and religion with each other, but to examine other things of interest from these two different perspectives. In this way, we should all learn something, regardless of which perspective we are most comfortable with.
We can do that. We can look at various things from a scientific point of view as from a religious point of view. But once again the ultimate result will be a comparison between science and religion. When these two are applied to same thing, there can be agreement as well as disagreement. Disagreement can cause unnecessary clash between the two. So, finally, I believe that such comparison is unnecessary
slj3988
Posts: 204
Joined: 12 Dec 2019, 18:20
Currently Reading: Lord of the rings
Bookshelf Size: 180
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-slj3988.html
Latest Review: Learn to Love: Guide to Healing Your Disappointing Love Life by Thomas Jordan, Ph.D.

Post by slj3988 »

The way I look at it is both science and religion are part of our struggle to make sense of our reality. We seek to find purpose. There's no way for us to prove or disprove what it all means. We decide for ourselves. So there's no reason anyone should find fiction or non-fiction where the two clash to be inappropriate. It's about finding your place in the world, not one judging the other. I realise certain followers of faith have strict views, as much as believers in science argue for logic. A person of science is taught to question. A person of faith is taught to accept. I think it is down to the reader how they choose to receive it.
User avatar
Sushan Ekanayake
Official Reviewer Representative
Posts: 5274
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
Currently Reading: The Stylite
Bookshelf Size: 443
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
Reading Device: B0794JC2K5

Post by Sushan Ekanayake »

slj3988 wrote: 23 Dec 2020, 22:25 The way I look at it is both science and religion are part of our struggle to make sense of our reality. We seek to find purpose. There's no way for us to prove or disprove what it all means. We decide for ourselves. So there's no reason anyone should find fiction or non-fiction where the two clash to be inappropriate. It's about finding your place in the world, not one judging the other. I realise certain followers of faith have strict views, as much as believers in science argue for logic. A person of science is taught to question. A person of faith is taught to accept. I think it is down to the reader how they choose to receive it.
Surely it is. It is a personal thing to choose between religion and science, or bits from both. As far as you keep your opinions to yourself, there won't be any issue. But the clash occurs when someone tries to compare the two, because such a comparison will inevitability make one party superior and the other inferior. That is why I believe that such a comparison is unnecessary
User avatar
Sushan Ekanayake
Official Reviewer Representative
Posts: 5274
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
Currently Reading: The Stylite
Bookshelf Size: 443
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
Reading Device: B0794JC2K5

Post by Sushan Ekanayake »

Bisqwik wrote: 23 Dec 2020, 15:48 When I was younger I used to preach sermons. I enjoyed it quite a lot. But I learned the hard way that some people are not okay with the idea of mixing science and religion. Even when its to make religion stronger. In my case, one example is that in the Bible it says that an eye blink to God is as a millenium to mankind. I reasoned that meant that the 7 days to create everything was in God's time. Which would mean millions of years to us. And of clay being able to be the rise of creatures from the ocean etc. That was not received well at all. There are plenty of historical issues with the Bible alone, things that don't fit or contradict. But I've always thought a marriage of both concepts was closest to the truth
There are biblical facts that can be interpreted in ways that are palatable to the science-loving guys, but not everything can be interpreted in such a way. Most of the times when these two are compared the results have not been very pleasant. So it is better to leave them apart than trying to converge
User avatar
Foluso Falaye
Posts: 154
Joined: 26 Sep 2019, 13:05
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 26
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-foluso-falaye.html
Latest Review: Man Mission by Eytan Uliel

Post by Foluso Falaye »

Beliefs have no boundaries. You can use anything to justify your belief. As long as you believe in something, everything else can be tweaked to prove it. I guess it depends on you as a person. Do you live by faith or facts? If you you use facts to prove the unproven side of your faith, it's still faith and not really science. Science is all facts.
Honey1495
Posts: 18
Joined: 07 Jun 2020, 07:37
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 24
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-honey1495.html
Latest Review: The Necessity of Finance by Dr. Anthony M. Criniti IV

Post by Honey1495 »

Religious beliefs are emotions, while science is fact. It is subjective whether using science to contrast religion is OK or not. But I find it exciting to get the scientific proof to my religious believes. It doesn't really justify my believes, rather it is satisfying to read science factualize something that I have believed without needing proof of.
User avatar
Sushan Ekanayake
Official Reviewer Representative
Posts: 5274
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
Currently Reading: The Stylite
Bookshelf Size: 443
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
Reading Device: B0794JC2K5

Post by Sushan Ekanayake »

Folushour wrote: 24 Dec 2020, 05:27 Beliefs have no boundaries. You can use anything to justify your belief. As long as you believe in something, everything else can be tweaked to prove it. I guess it depends on you as a person. Do you live by faith or facts? If you you use facts to prove the unproven side of your faith, it's still faith and not really science. Science is all facts.
Proving your beliefs is a way that science can be make use of. Similarly it can be used to disprove someone's beliefs as well. Science is developed on hypotheses. They are being experimented and either accepted or rejected. But that is not very much applicable to religious matters since it can cause issues. So better to keep things apart from each other
User avatar
Sushan Ekanayake
Official Reviewer Representative
Posts: 5274
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
Currently Reading: The Stylite
Bookshelf Size: 443
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
Reading Device: B0794JC2K5

Post by Sushan Ekanayake »

Honey1495 wrote: 24 Dec 2020, 10:20 Religious beliefs are emotions, while science is fact. It is subjective whether using science to contrast religion is OK or not. But I find it exciting to get the scientific proof to my religious believes. It doesn't really justify my believes, rather it is satisfying to read science factualize something that I have believed without needing proof of.
Religious devouts can e satisfied when science confirms the religious beliefs. But what will be the result when some religious beliefs are disproved by science? That won't be a very pleasant experience to the believers and many will deny to accept. So a comparison between these two will most probably lead to unnecessary chaos
User avatar
leiabutler
Posts: 176
Joined: 08 Apr 2019, 16:51
Currently Reading: I Will Make of Thee a Great Nation
Bookshelf Size: 36
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-leiabutler.html
Latest Review: Britain Loves Baking - The Bakers Annual 2020 by Greg Wixted

Post by leiabutler »

I don't think it is easy to compare them, as they are based in completely different origins and have completely different arguments. However I think it can be interesting to see where those differences and similarities are. Without the option for contrasting them, it might be harder to see the strengths and weaknesses are!
'At his lips' touch she blossomed for him like a flower and the incarnation was complete'
The Great Gatsby
JB3
Posts: 102
Joined: 16 Jun 2020, 02:37
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 34
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jb3.html
Latest Review: Shadow Game by A.M. Adair

Post by JB3 »

I think that they can both enhance our understanding of the other. Science can be used to explain certain instances of religion and religion can be used to full in the gaps in our knowledge
User avatar
Sushan Ekanayake
Official Reviewer Representative
Posts: 5274
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
Currently Reading: The Stylite
Bookshelf Size: 443
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
Reading Device: B0794JC2K5

Post by Sushan Ekanayake »

leiabutler wrote: 24 Dec 2020, 17:29 I don't think it is easy to compare them, as they are based in completely different origins and have completely different arguments. However I think it can be interesting to see where those differences and similarities are. Without the option for contrasting them, it might be harder to see the strengths and weaknesses are!
Indeed it is a difficult comparison. And in such a comparison, inevitably the strengths and weaknesses of each party will be revealed, and that won't be equally accepted by all, especially the weaknesses in a religious belief won't be well accepted by the devouts. So such a comparison will lead to nothing but chaos
User avatar
63tty
Posts: 768
Joined: 16 Oct 2020, 09:16
Favorite Author: Tayma Tameem
Currently Reading: Killing Abel
Bookshelf Size: 349
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-63tty.html
Latest Review: The Maestro Monologue by Rob White
fav_author_id: 199293

Post by 63tty »

I think you can compare all you want but at the end of the day, what matters is, are you content with what you believe? Whether science, the bible or both. Personally, I don't have the luxury of comparing. I think religion keeps me grounded and science is a huge part of my profession which I love. So its kind of an afair for me.
“If love is the answer, could you rephrase the question?”
~Lily Tomlin
User avatar
Sushan Ekanayake
Official Reviewer Representative
Posts: 5274
Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
Currently Reading: The Stylite
Bookshelf Size: 443
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
Latest Review: Crimeline Hollywood by Thomas Collins
Reading Device: B0794JC2K5

Post by Sushan Ekanayake »

63tty wrote: 25 Dec 2020, 05:13 I think you can compare all you want but at the end of the day, what matters is, are you content with what you believe? Whether science, the bible or both. Personally, I don't have the luxury of comparing. I think religion keeps me grounded and science is a huge part of my profession which I love. So its kind of an afair for me.
Most of the time people will try the comparison to prove what they believe is true. No one will compare the two and disprove his/her own beliefs, unless he/she is a very open-minded one. But the problem occurs when someone tries to compare the two and use that to discredit or disprove someone else's beliefs. So it is okay to compare if you do that with a pure heart, but, if not, it is better not to compare at all
User avatar
Ahbed Nadir
Posts: 306
Joined: 14 Nov 2020, 02:33
Currently Reading: Brandy, Ballad of a Pirate Princess
Bookshelf Size: 51
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ahbed-nadir.html
Latest Review: There's Always Tomorrow by Jim Carr

Post by Ahbed Nadir »

Sushan wrote: 22 Dec 2020, 11:00
Ahbed Nadir wrote: 22 Dec 2020, 07:16 I'm not sure they should be compared. They are directly in contrast with each other as science deals with logic whereas religion is based off on belief.
The core concepts are different when science and religion are considered. Science accepts experimentally proven facts which are objective, but the religious values the subjective facts which are based on beliefs of the devouts. So the two are parallel, but doesn't find any common ground in which they can be compared
I don't agree with this at all. There's no correlation between science and religion. I mean according to science man is descended from monkeys but according to religion man was created instantaneously by God so I don't think the two can be reconciled at all.
"It takes a great deal of bravery to stand up to our enemies, but just as much to stand up to our friends"- Albus Dumbledore
User avatar
Maddie Atkinson
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 403
Joined: 13 Nov 2020, 05:30
Favorite Author: Julia Chapman
Favorite Book: gender euphoria
Currently Reading: The Appeal
Bookshelf Size: 105
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-maddie-atkinson.html
Latest Review: A King Amongst Us by A.D. Lewis
fav_author_id: 84942
2025 Reading Goal: 30
2025 Goal Completion: 33%

Post by Maddie Atkinson »

Ahbed Nadir wrote: 25 Dec 2020, 16:13
Sushan wrote: 22 Dec 2020, 11:00
Ahbed Nadir wrote: 22 Dec 2020, 07:16 I'm not sure they should be compared. They are directly in contrast with each other as science deals with logic whereas religion is based off on belief.
The core concepts are different when science and religion are considered. Science accepts experimentally proven facts which are objective, but the religious values the subjective facts which are based on beliefs of the devouts. So the two are parallel, but doesn't find any common ground in which they can be compared
I don't agree with this at all. There's no correlation between science and religion. I mean according to science man is descended from monkeys but according to religion man was created instantaneously by God so I don't think the two can be reconciled at all.
That's only one example though, there are plenty of other ways that science and religion can be compared. Science can be used to prove events in the Bible!
"I decided a while ago not to deny myself the simpler pleasures of existence" - Augustus Waters (The Fault in Our Stars)
Post Reply

Return to “Discuss "Wilderness Cry" by Hilary L Hunt M.D.”