OnlineBookClub.org

Posted: **19 Sep 2022, 16:26**

Sushan wrote: ↑01 Dec 2020, 00:40 The author uses her knowledge regarding quantum physics and other philosophical studies to challenge and see the true meaning of the religious teachings that the world has known and believed for decades.

But as far as we know, religious teachings are a set of beliefs that are based on various historical events, cultural values, and even mythical stories. Some of these things cannot be either proved or neglected by either science or philosophy.

Considering that argument, is this okay to compare religions with science as the author has done in this book?

I wouldn't say it's wise to compare religion to science. I believe the knowledge science implies is gotten from omniscience and trying to date by to the beginning or trying to use science to compare if biblical facts are true is not wise to me.

Posted: **10 Oct 2022, 13:59**

I think it is okay to compare the two, that doesn't change the facts. Where I have a problem with books that compare science and creation is when the person doing the comparison is obviously doing it to disprove there is a God! It is one of those 'aha, I told you so' comparisons! I don't see that in this book, at least not so far, so I think it is fine to compare the two to solidify the truth!

OnlineBookClub.org

Is it okay to compare and contrast science and religion?

Re: Is it okay to compare and contrast science and religion?

Re: Is it okay to compare and contrast science and religion?