Review: Invisible Cities by Italo Calvino
- FaryalS
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 14 Sep 2014, 11:14
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-faryals.html
Review: Invisible Cities by Italo Calvino
"Kublai Khan does not necessarily believe everything Marco Polo says when he describes the cities visited on his expeditions, but the emperor of the Tartars does continue listening to the young Venetian with greater attention and curiosity than he shows any other messenger or explorer of his"; so begins Calvino's compilation of fragmented urban imageries. Polo tells the Khan about Hypatia, a city of beautiful blue lagoons but where "crabs were biting the eyes of the suicides, stones tied around their necks"; Armilla, which "has nothing that makes it seem a city, except the water pipes that rise vertically where the houses should be and spread out horizontally where the floors should be"; the spider-web city of Octavia, whose residents live suspended over an abyss, supported by a net they know won't last long; and other marvellous cities. It may be that he is creating them all out of his imagination, or perhaps he is recreating details of his native Venice over and over again, or perhaps he is simply recounting some of the countless possible forms a city might take.
At some point, you realize that Calvino is not talking about cities at all; not in the way we normally think of the word. His cities are constructed not of steel and concrete but of ideas. Each city represents a thought, an experiment, and an expression of some deeper sentiment or, as Polo tells Khan at one point, "You take delight not in a city's seven or seventy wonders but in the answer it gives to a question of yours."
This is a slim book, but not the kind you devour in one sitting. I find myself pausing every two or three pages to process what I have just read, not because Calvino's writing is difficult to penetrate, but simply because the fact that he packs so much into each sentence; there is so much there. It is best, I think, to read Invisible Cities like a traveller - slowly, luxuriously, as if you have all the time in the world.
One of the cities described in the book ends with a warning, “You leave Tamara without having discovered it”; so it is with Invisible Cities. This is precisely what keeps drawing you back to this strange and wonderful book.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 11 Apr 2011, 12:46
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Mickaila
- Posts: 135
- Joined: 05 Aug 2014, 16:30
- Favorite Book: The Iliad
- Currently Reading: Most Evil by Michael Stone
- Bookshelf Size: 1
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mickaila.html
- Latest Review: "Liar Lindly Brandt" by Aften Brook Szymanski
I felt the same way, good review though!Wreade1872 wrote:I read this didn't think too much of it, its ok but i don't know... i guess it seemed a little childish. Maybe it was just childish in the same way people think 'Gulliver's Travels' are.

- FaryalS
- Posts: 8
- Joined: 14 Sep 2014, 11:14
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-faryals.html
I appreciate your remarks but, I found this book really interesting and Calvino's wild imagination about metropolises is just remarkable. Don't you agree?Mickaila wrote:I felt the same way, good review though!Wreade1872 wrote:I read this didn't think too much of it, its ok but i don't know... i guess it seemed a little childish. Maybe it was just childish in the same way people think 'Gulliver's Travels' are.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: 11 Apr 2011, 12:46
- Bookshelf Size: 0
I don't disagree... and i read this as part of my 'things referenced in the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen graphic novels' reading list, so i'd also hate to disagree with Alan Moore who apparently quite liked it too.FaryalS wrote:I appreciate your remarks but, I found this book really interesting and Calvino's wild imagination about metropolises is just remarkable. Don't you agree?Mickaila wrote:I felt the same way, good review though!Wreade1872 wrote:I read this didn't think too much of it, its ok but i don't know... i guess it seemed a little childish. Maybe it was just childish in the same way people think 'Gulliver's Travels' are.
However all the ideas are expressed so shortly and i have always had an issue with short stories, the longer the tale the better for me. Maybe i'm just a little slow at absorbing things and in this there was another idea along before i could process the last one.
At the same time while it is imaginative as i've said before there is something childish about it and i honestly don't know what i mean by that lol. Its just a feeling, i will acknowledge the brilliance of the work because people i respect tell me how good it is but it simply didn't grab me.