Review of Complexity Thinking
-
Mamta Singhal
- Posts: 83
- Joined: 07 Apr 2024, 02:38
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 82
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-mamta-singhal.html
- Latest Review: Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress by Gustavo Kinrys, MD
Review of Complexity Thinking
[Following is an official OnlineBookClub.org review of "Complexity Thinking" by Cornelis Pieter Pieters.]
"Complexity Thinking" by Cornelis Pieter Pieters.
The author proposes a new understanding of truth, called the "dialectic of complexity," which has been elaborated throughout the book. The author argues that the legitimacy crisis in science and politics is rooted in the increasing complexity and uncertainty of the modern world. The book aims to rethink the concepts of "objectivity," "fact," and "truth" by integrating complexity thinking, which respects scientific aspirations while acknowledging postmodern critiques. Everything we experience is a pattern, whether it’s knowledge, existence, or communication. This concept aligns with ancient philosophy, like that of Zeno of Elea. Understanding patterns helps in various scientific domains, emphasizing that exact science should represent patterns as they truly are.
The "pattern of difference" is crucial in physics, mathematics, and beyond. Differences require a common reference frame to be observed. For example, in electronics, different voltages need a common ground to function. This pattern shows that context determines whether things are seen as similar or different. Some hospitals now have trainees undergo treatments they will give to patients to improve their understanding. Science is now seen as a professional practice with its own specific aims and methods, rather than the ultimate standard for all professions. Much of professional work involves subjective decision-making. Professionals often use intuition and practical experience to solve problems in complex environments. This recognition highlights the limits of scientific approaches in real-world professional practices.
"Complexity Thinking" explores the intricate interplay between knowledge and its observers. It critiques the traditional scientific approach of reducing complexity through simplified models and emphasizes a holistic perspective where complexity is embraced rather than simplified. The book argues that science must evolve by integrating lessons from various disciplines and acknowledging the self-referential nature of knowledge. Key themes include the influence of observers on the objects of study, the ethical implications of knowledge production, and the need for interdisciplinary approaches. It posits that understanding complexity requires a blend of scientific rigor and philosophical insight, challenging the clear-cut boundaries of academic specializations. Ultimately, the book advocates for a paradigm shift in how we approach scientific inquiry, urging a move away from reductionism towards a more integrated and reflective methodology. Overall, the book deserves 5 out of 5 stars from my side, and the book's editing is taintless and priceless.
I recommend this book for interdisciplinary scholars, philosophers, and scientists interested in holistic approaches, the integration of diverse fields, and the interplay between knowledge and its observers. It suits those who appreciate the blend of scientific rigor with philosophical insights and a reflective methodology. The book has no dislikes, and it is also commendable.
******
Complexity Thinking
View: on Bookshelves
"Complexity Thinking" by Cornelis Pieter Pieters.
The author proposes a new understanding of truth, called the "dialectic of complexity," which has been elaborated throughout the book. The author argues that the legitimacy crisis in science and politics is rooted in the increasing complexity and uncertainty of the modern world. The book aims to rethink the concepts of "objectivity," "fact," and "truth" by integrating complexity thinking, which respects scientific aspirations while acknowledging postmodern critiques. Everything we experience is a pattern, whether it’s knowledge, existence, or communication. This concept aligns with ancient philosophy, like that of Zeno of Elea. Understanding patterns helps in various scientific domains, emphasizing that exact science should represent patterns as they truly are.
The "pattern of difference" is crucial in physics, mathematics, and beyond. Differences require a common reference frame to be observed. For example, in electronics, different voltages need a common ground to function. This pattern shows that context determines whether things are seen as similar or different. Some hospitals now have trainees undergo treatments they will give to patients to improve their understanding. Science is now seen as a professional practice with its own specific aims and methods, rather than the ultimate standard for all professions. Much of professional work involves subjective decision-making. Professionals often use intuition and practical experience to solve problems in complex environments. This recognition highlights the limits of scientific approaches in real-world professional practices.
"Complexity Thinking" explores the intricate interplay between knowledge and its observers. It critiques the traditional scientific approach of reducing complexity through simplified models and emphasizes a holistic perspective where complexity is embraced rather than simplified. The book argues that science must evolve by integrating lessons from various disciplines and acknowledging the self-referential nature of knowledge. Key themes include the influence of observers on the objects of study, the ethical implications of knowledge production, and the need for interdisciplinary approaches. It posits that understanding complexity requires a blend of scientific rigor and philosophical insight, challenging the clear-cut boundaries of academic specializations. Ultimately, the book advocates for a paradigm shift in how we approach scientific inquiry, urging a move away from reductionism towards a more integrated and reflective methodology. Overall, the book deserves 5 out of 5 stars from my side, and the book's editing is taintless and priceless.
I recommend this book for interdisciplinary scholars, philosophers, and scientists interested in holistic approaches, the integration of diverse fields, and the interplay between knowledge and its observers. It suits those who appreciate the blend of scientific rigor with philosophical insights and a reflective methodology. The book has no dislikes, and it is also commendable.
******
Complexity Thinking
View: on Bookshelves
Latest Review: Natural Relief for Anxiety and Stress by Gustavo Kinrys, MD
