Official Review: Wading through the Bullshit of the 2020 ...

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 19 Apr 2020, 09:22

[Following is an official OnlineBookClub.org review of "Wading through the Bullshit of the 2020 Election and The Big Six Establishment Lies:" by Mar the Wader.]

2 out of 4 stars

Share This Review

My somewhat critical and skeptical stance toward politics made me pick up Wading through the Bullshit of the 2020 Election and The Big Six Establishment Lies, written by Mar the Wader. As expected, throughout the book, the author paints his disbelief in the establishment in bold strokes as readers get roughly a century’s worth of facts and political opinions.

The book presents a lot of information and an impressive array of economic and political analyses; this was what I liked the most about it. The author, who was born in the Soviet Union and lived in several countries, comes off as an articulate and well-informed man. He has extensive knowledge in various fields, including statistics and law. He thoroughly explores what he considers to be the six big lies of the establishment: governmental economic reporting, the legal system, affordable health care, immigration, education, and JFK’s assassination by a lone gunman. Each topic gets presented against a comprehensive historical and geopolitical background, which I appreciated. The book is also current and up to date; there are even mentions to the coronavirus.

On the other hand, there are several negative aspects to mention, and unfortunately, they outweigh the positive points by far. For starters, the writing style is tortuous, and the narrative is erratic. The author admits to having a “convoluted thought process,” which becomes increasingly disturbing as the book progresses.

What I most disliked was the author’s caustically sarcastic and aggressive tone. Balance and composure have no place in this narrative. The author seems very eager to inflame and polarize readers, which is odd, for he often expresses himself like the politicians he so strongly criticizes. I found his strong feelings against immigration odd since he is an immigrant himself.

Additionally, I’m not sure I liked how he depicts women in the book, and his remarks often felt misogynistic. For instance, his comments about the Weinstein trial were insensitive. His discussion of what consent should mean was particularly obnoxious, and I would discourage any victim of sexual harassment from reading this book. Some of his crass assumptions about women also come up as he narrates his sexual encounters. I was also bothered by how profanity features prominently, although the author proudly states that he does not think of certain words as profanities: “I just talk that way.”

In closing, due to the negatives previously mentioned and to the numerous spelling, grammatical, and formatting mistakes, I’m taking two stars away from the rating. Thus, I rate the book 2 out of 4 stars. It reads like a rough first draft and desperately needs professional editing, but I don’t give it the lowest rating because it does contain some relevant information. I believe the book might appeal to readers who enjoy conspiracy theories and harsh, relentless criticism of the establishment. If you are bothered by controversial and polarized political discussions, you should probably skip this one.

******
Wading through the Bullshit of the 2020 Election and The Big Six Establishment Lies:
View: on Bookshelves

Post by **Ngozi Onyibor** » 25 Apr 2020, 12:59

Although the author presents some interesting information, I will have to pass on this one. His obvious bias and disrespect for women doesn't seem like something I can overlook. Thanks for your honest and detailed analysis.

lrosselli · Post by **lrosselli** » 25 Apr 2020, 15:01

The title caught my eye just like it caught yours. I was very interested in reading this book before I read your review, now, not so much.

It's unfortunate that someone who is so educated and could probably provide really great information is so overcome by personal biases. Biases, that I happen to be opposed to.

It also sounds like this author was in desperate need of an editor. It seems that so many others decide against getting an editor because of the cost, but editors are an investment! They infallibly make a book so much better and a better book means more sales. However, I wonder if this author decided against an editor because he didn't want his views "censored." It wouldn't surprise me if the author believed that editors are just a pawn in a huge conspiracy.

Stephanie Elizabeth · Post by **Stephanie Elizabeth** » 25 Apr 2020, 17:35

I decided to pass on this book when you mentioned "convoluted thought process." I think, had this book been editing properly, I may have given it a chance. Thanks for the informative review.

bookreviewmi1111 · Post by **bookreviewmi1111** » 25 Apr 2020, 21:00

Thank you for the honest review. If a book has a strong political view and the author does not respect women or immigrants then it's probably not what I am going to read.

Harty · Post by **Harty** » 26 Apr 2020, 03:46

I hope this book covers all the insider knowledge of the American election, what the mainstream news is ignoring. I like that the author is well informed in the subject. Thanks for the review.

Kristabella · Post by **Kristabella** » 26 Apr 2020, 09:31

Will definitely not be reading this book! Thanks for your honesty

Adanna Inya · Post by **Adanna Inya** » 26 Apr 2020, 10:00

When I saw the book title, I said, "what a name." It piqued my interest. But right now, I don't care for how much information or receipts he came with. The book should never see the light of day, please.

It's tough enough that we are trying to make women feel safer in today's world. We don't need one more person cheering misogyny and traumatizing abuse victims. And then, passing his point accross with such aggression, bias and profanities? No way!
I'll pass.

Thanks for this thoroughly honest review.

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 26 Apr 2020, 12:04

Michelle Fred wrote: ↑25 Apr 2020, 12:59 Although the author presents some interesting information, I will have to pass on this one. His obvious bias and disrespect for women doesn't seem like something I can overlook. Thanks for your honest and detailed analysis.

Yep. I see what you mean. Thank you for commenting!

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 26 Apr 2020, 12:05

lrosselli wrote: ↑25 Apr 2020, 15:01 The title caught my eye just like it caught yours. I was very interested in reading this book before I read your review, now, not so much.

It's unfortunate that someone who is so educated and could probably provide really great information is so overcome by personal biases. Biases, that I happen to be opposed to.

It also sounds like this author was in desperate need of an editor. It seems that so many others decide against getting an editor because of the cost, but editors are an investment! They infallibly make a book so much better and a better book means more sales. However, I wonder if this author decided against an editor because he didn't want his views "censored." It wouldn't surprise me if the author believed that editors are just a pawn in a huge conspiracy.

Good points. I also believe that editors are an investment. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 26 Apr 2020, 12:06

Stephanie Elizabeth wrote: ↑25 Apr 2020, 17:35 I decided to pass on this book when you mentioned "convoluted thought process." I think, had this book been editing properly, I may have given it a chance. Thanks for the informative review.

It does need professional editing. Anyway, I appreciate your comments. Thanks!

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 26 Apr 2020, 12:08

bookreviewmi1111 wrote: ↑25 Apr 2020, 21:00 Thank you for the honest review. If a book has a strong political view and the author does not respect women or immigrants then it's probably not what I am going to read.

I totally understand. It is definitely a challenging book to read. Thank you so much for reading and commenting!

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 26 Apr 2020, 12:09

Harty wrote: ↑26 Apr 2020, 03:46 I hope this book covers all the insider knowledge of the American election, what the mainstream news is ignoring. I like that the author is well informed in the subject. Thanks for the review.

Thank you for stopping by!

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 26 Apr 2020, 12:10

Kristabella wrote: ↑26 Apr 2020, 09:31 Will definitely not be reading this book! Thanks for your honesty

Thanks for commenting!

mmm17 · Post by **mmm17** » 26 Apr 2020, 12:12

Adanna Inya wrote: ↑26 Apr 2020, 10:00 When I saw the book title, I said, "what a name." It piqued my interest. But right now, I don't care for how much information or receipts he came with. The book should never see the light of day, please.

It's tough enough that we are trying to make women feel safer in today's world. We don't need one more person cheering misogyny and traumatizing abuse victims. And then, passing his point accross with such aggression, bias and profanities? No way!
I'll pass.

Thanks for this thoroughly honest review.

You make very good points. I appreciate your comments!