OnlineBookClub.org

The television interview was more dramatic, the radio interview was all about revealing a lie, but terrorism is a topic that is considered sensitive and I thought John set himself up for a disaster.

I think that the television interview was more dramatic, as its repercussions were more palpable and a visual image only added to that.

I personally think the Television created a sophisticated drama, I mean he touch on terrorist attack which send shivers down the spine to anyone

The radio interview is definitely more dramatic as it caused quite a stir and rouse in the media and generally. Enjoyed reading it more as well.

I think the Radio interview is more dramatic because it allows room to anonymously arouse the audience and stir conversations around terrorists attacks.

I enjoyed both interviews. But I think the TV interview was more dramatic because there weren't lies and John got to talk for himself and share his thoughts

In terms of drama, the television interview takes the cake. In that moment, he was aware of the "eyes" on him and as a result, he acted strangely and revealed things which came across as chilling such as the inspiration behind his design. I would have also preferred watching the interview live on TV than listening to it to see his reactions, facial expressions and physical gestures.

The TV interview is more dramatic. Although I like reading the radio interview. I was wondering why he was almost feeling that compassionate about the terrorist on the TV interview.

I would go with the radio interview because of the realization of the fact that he is actually on his own. Such moment in a person's life is always experiential and that can hit one in very had way.
Both were quite dramatic, but the radio interview shaped his character development further.

In reality, audio- visual appeals more than the audio that creates suspense as there are more questions unanswered. Hence, John's television interview was more appealing as it's description involved the audience to think more of John's words, posture and outward presentation than the radio which had influence from Zenith.

I think the television interview was more dramatic. The way John expressed himself simply made it feel like he empathized with the terrorists. I didn't like the radio interview as it was based on lies.

Although the TV interview was more informative and thought-provoking, I found the radio interview more dramatic. It was pretty shocking, especially to John.

Pete's interview was a jaw-drop moment for me. I started considering the possibility of him actually being the designer and some points seemed to not be adding up in Johns's case.

I think the Tv interview with John was more dramatic and better than the radio interview. This is mainly because I didn't like the radio one because it seemed to lean toward Zenith's angle, which was based on lies. Even though John seemed too eager or even hopeful for the terrorists attack angle, I think it was the better interview.

In my opinion, both the radio and tv interviews were very dramatic but would say the feeling at the radio interview was tenser.