Page 1 of 1

Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 15 May 2025, 20:44
by Gerry Steen
I would have thought that Frank would have put more heart and soul into his job—his daughter's death should have been motivation enough to make the project run smoothly and to learn what he needed to learn to ensure good data entry procedures.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 16 May 2025, 10:31
by Diana Lowery
I think lackadaisical is the perfect adjective to describe Frank. He did not seem very vested in the project. I wonder if the author based his character on someone she has worked with.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 16 May 2025, 16:05
by Maggie Johnson 2
Considering what happened to his daughter, I would have expected him to be a lot more motivated as well. I could even imagine him gravitating more towards the other end of the management-style spectrum and micromanaging everyone.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 18 May 2025, 02:41
by Rashad Deniro Price
It is really worrisome. I kept wondering how Frank acted that way. His daughter's death should have, realistically, been a motivation on its own. Maybe, the author just wanted to him to act this way.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 26 May 2025, 11:12
by Wamboi Susan
I was disappointed with how Frank handled the project. I had hoped to understand his reasoning better. Perhaps he was still processing his daughter's death,which influenced his decisions-or maybe that was simply his nature.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 27 May 2025, 21:57
by Josephe-Anne
Diana Lowery wrote: 16 May 2025, 10:31 I think lackadaisical is the perfect adjective to describe Frank. He did not seem very vested in the project. I wonder if the author based his character on someone she has worked with.
Ha! Great observation! Authors often create characters based on people they know. I agree that Frank did not lead as he should have. He kept delegating his responsibilities to other staff members instead of doing them himself. He also brushed off Tanisha every time she asked him for help.

In one way, I'm surprised that he wasn't more involved, but in another way, it doesn't surprise me at all because there are many lazy people in this world who want a quick buck without putting in the work. However, in Frank's defense, maybe he was still very depressed due to his daughter's passing and found it difficult to focus on his work.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 09 Jun 2025, 17:44
by Ali Pinar
"lackadaisical" and managing a research project do not go well together. I am sure I would be very frustrated if I were working on that project.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 11 Jun 2025, 21:58
by Ruth Shirk
After having a daughter who almost died, several days in ICU, I can tell you that it changes the way you look at many things in unexpected ways. The trauma afterwards took a great toll on me. I wonder if she died, if I would have emotionally been able to become invested in a project in her memory. Mentally, I would definitely wanted to become involved.

Re: Were you surprised at Frank's lackadaisical approach to managing the research project?

Posted: 03 Jul 2025, 19:36
by FelinaAlpuertoPittman2859+
Frank did not exhibit a whole lot of enthusiasm in managing the research project, so lackadaisical is the appropriate term to describe his approach. He had the right reasons for heading the research program, but his supervising skills leave much to be desired. Perhaps he had other personal issues in mind that he was still struggling with.