Grammar: had, had had

Some grammar rules (and embarrassing mistakes!) transcend the uniqueness of different regions and style guides. This new International Grammar section by OnlineBookClub.org ultimately identifies those rules thus providing a simple, flexible rule-set, respecting the differences between regions and style guides. You can feel free to ask general questions about spelling and grammar. You can also provide example sentences for other members to proofread and inform you of any grammar mistakes.

Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives

Post Reply
User avatar
MichelleYong
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 76
Joined: 13 Nov 2022, 11:05
Currently Reading: Good Sexual Hygiene & Spiritual Attitude
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-michelleyong.html
Latest Review: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures by Catherine A. Pepe

Grammar: had, had had

Post by MichelleYong »

In my latest review, an editor first checked my score, got full marks in grammar. And another checked and found an error, which is the following.

Original:
Before the children went to live at their grandparent's house, Mary Jane had had to cope with being separated from her parents.

Editor:
Before the children went to live at their grandparent's house, Mary Jane had to cope with being separated from her parents.

I checked both on grammarly, and both turned out to be correct. What's the difference between the two? And are both acceptable, or only one is correct. Please help :shock: English is really making me go Poco loco
User avatar
Blackstenius
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 521
Joined: 30 Nov 2022, 06:33
Favorite Book: The Magician's Secret
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 51
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-blackstenius.html
Latest Review: Amora by Grant Hallstrom

Post by Blackstenius »

Both are grammatically correct. The error would depend on whether it's one or two grandparents.
The gift turned out to be a curse. They killed him with kindness.
User avatar
MichelleYong
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 76
Joined: 13 Nov 2022, 11:05
Currently Reading: Good Sexual Hygiene & Spiritual Attitude
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-michelleyong.html
Latest Review: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures by Catherine A. Pepe

Post by MichelleYong »

namesake wrote: 15 Jan 2023, 00:51 Both are grammatically correct. The error would depend on whether it's one or two grandparents.
Had for one grandparent and had had for two? Or vice versa?

Anyhow, thank you for clarifying this. I will take your word for it.
User avatar
Blackstenius
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 521
Joined: 30 Nov 2022, 06:33
Favorite Book: The Magician's Secret
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 51
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-blackstenius.html
Latest Review: Amora by Grant Hallstrom

Post by Blackstenius »

MichelleYong wrote: 15 Jan 2023, 07:10
namesake wrote: 15 Jan 2023, 00:51 Both are grammatically correct. The error would depend on whether it's one or two grandparents.
Had for one grandparent and had had for two? Or vice versa?

Anyhow, thank you for clarifying this. I will take your word for it.

No, I'm not referring to 'had' and 'had had'. I'm talking about the placement of the apostrophe in the word grandparents, if it's one it's placed before the s and if they are two it's placed after the s.
The gift turned out to be a curse. They killed him with kindness.
User avatar
MichelleYong
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 76
Joined: 13 Nov 2022, 11:05
Currently Reading: Good Sexual Hygiene & Spiritual Attitude
Bookshelf Size: 19
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-michelleyong.html
Latest Review: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures by Catherine A. Pepe

Post by MichelleYong »

Oh.. that was a embarrassing misunderstanding :oops:
User avatar
Emily Meadows
In It Together VIP
Posts: 571
Joined: 29 Sep 2022, 15:15
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 78
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-emily-meadows.html
Latest Review: Forever Young by Karma Wiederrick

Post by Emily Meadows »

MichelleYong wrote: 15 Jan 2023, 00:40 English is really making me go Poco loco
This ^^. English is a pain in the booty! hahaha. So many rules, so little time.
User avatar
Omneya Shakeep
Book of the Month Participant
Posts: 911
Joined: 20 Oct 2022, 15:29
Favorite Book: Catching Genesis
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 161
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-omneya-shakeep.html
Latest Review: The Movie Chair by Shari Borkin

Post by Omneya Shakeep »

Your sentence is correct if you are referring to an action in the past and another that happened before it in the timeline (past simple, had had). The other sentence is correct if the two actions were in the same timeline in the past but were consecutive (past simple, had).

https://www.englishgrammar.org/have-had-and-had-had/
"Those who feel grateful, and are eternally generous, experience life at its richest."
Rob White.
User avatar
Shane Lucey
Posts: 64
Joined: 27 Dec 2022, 04:01
Currently Reading:
Bookshelf Size: 13
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shane-lucey.html
Latest Review: The Freedom Building by Martin Kendall
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Post by Shane Lucey »

Some more context might be helpful to know if the use of past perfect is needed. I generally try to avoid using had had since it is a bit jarring to the ears to me. Usually there is a better sounding way to phrase the sentence even if the usage of “had had” is grammatically correct.

One way to evaluate your sentence is to reword it and re-evaluate. See below:

Mary Jane had to cope with being separated from her parents before the children went to live at their grandparent's house.

Versus:

Mary Jane had had to cope with being separated from her parents before the children went to live at their grandparent's house.

Based on this limited information I tend to agree with the second editor.
Andrew Butchers
Posts: 66
Joined: 10 Nov 2022, 15:00
Currently Reading: The Long Arm of Fantomas
Bookshelf Size: 51

Post by Andrew Butchers »

Surely "had had" is the pluperfect or past perfect (two terms for the same thing). That is used to refer to an action which happened before another action in the past.

But, to be frank, I am not sure that I can see a difference in meaning between the two.
Post Reply

Return to “International Grammar”