Which of these sentence versions is correct?
Moderator: Official Reviewer Representatives
- Blackstenius
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 521
- Joined: 30 Nov 2022, 06:33
- Favorite Book: The Magician's Secret
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 51
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-blackstenius.html
- Latest Review: Amora by Grant Hallstrom
Which of these sentence versions is correct?
2.He becomes angry and bitter and, two years after their divorce, Sean is yet to move on.
Which among the two is correctly punctuated, and why?
- MsH2k
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: 31 Jul 2019, 11:11
- Favorite Book: Crushing
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 366
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-msh2k.html
- Latest Review: Lilleah by eelonqa K harris
Hi,Blackstenius wrote: ↑06 Apr 2023, 07:10 1. He becomes angry and bitter, and two years after their divorce, Sean is yet to move on.
2.He becomes angry and bitter and, two years after their divorce, Sean is yet to move on.
Which among the two is correctly punctuated, and why?
Both sentences are technically correct.
In #1, the first comma is before the coordinating conjunction separating two independent clauses, and the second comma is after the adverbial phrase “two years after their divorce” that introduces the second independent clause.
https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/commas ... junctions/
https://www.grammar-monster.com/lessons ... uction.htm
The commas in #2 are a bit more nuanced. There is no comma before the coordinating conjunction, but some style guides do not require it, and OBC does not follow a particular style guide. The first reference above mentions this as well. In this sentence, the commas used indicate “two years after their divorce” is not an essential element and the meaning of the sentence would not change if the phrase were omitted. If this is the intent, the commas are fine.
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writ ... ments.html
You didn’t ask , but I would recommend sticking with #1. The comma usage is more straightforward, and if this is part of a review, it may save you a recheck request.
Rosa Parks
- Blackstenius
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 521
- Joined: 30 Nov 2022, 06:33
- Favorite Book: The Magician's Secret
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 51
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-blackstenius.html
- Latest Review: Amora by Grant Hallstrom
Haha, I guess it's already too late. Yes, it's part of, and a recheck would be necessary. Thank you for the response.MsH2k wrote: ↑06 Apr 2023, 12:21Hi,Blackstenius wrote: ↑06 Apr 2023, 07:10 1. He becomes angry and bitter, and two years after their divorce, Sean is yet to move on.
2.He becomes angry and bitter and, two years after their divorce, Sean is yet to move on.
Which among the two is correctly punctuated, and why?
Both sentences are technically correct.
In #1, the first comma is before the coordinating conjunction separating two independent clauses, and the second comma is after the adverbial phrase “two years after their divorce” that introduces the second independent clause.
https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/commas ... junctions/
https://www.grammar-monster.com/lessons ... uction.htm
The commas in #2 are a bit more nuanced. There is no comma before the coordinating conjunction, but some style guides do not require it, and OBC does not follow a particular style guide. The first reference above mentions this as well. In this sentence, the commas used indicate “two years after their divorce” is not an essential element and the meaning of the sentence would not change if the phrase were omitted. If this is the intent, the commas are fine.
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writ ... ments.html
You didn’t ask :) , but I would recommend sticking with #1. The comma usage is more straightforward, and if this is part of a review, it may save you a recheck request.