OnlineBookClub.org

Hi! I will try to answer your question. First of all, in your first review, the editor said, " However, presenting them as a objective errors was against the guidelines.” I have re-read the guidelines in case they added a new addendum that I was not aware of. No, they did not. So, in my opinion, the editor was wrong. It was not a breach of the guidelines, and you could ask for a recheck. The second review was a breach of the guidelines, as you stated that there were no errors, yet you noted in the PRQ that there were formatting problems. What I have always done, and I have over 95 reviews under my belt, I note in my review that there were formatting errors, and then after I have listed the regular grammar errors or typos, I note the formatting errors but state that these are unaccounted errors. If there were no other accountable errors, then I would still note in the box that there were unaccounted formatting errors. I hope that this helps. I know that it is a little confusing at first to know what to count and what not to count. I used to list every missed comma in the book, but now, I don't even mention them as the editor can say that it is an Oxford comma and is optional.