Page 1 of 1
Punctuation in Review
Posted: 21 Sep 2018, 15:03
by RGraf
Per the instructions on the review scorecard page, I was to post my question here. It was noted in a review I submitted that a comma belonged before "but" in this sentence: So much of it reminded me of the world today but with a more sinister edge to it.
I do not think that is right as the clause after "but" is not independent. It is not a complete sentence.
Re: Punctuation in Review
Posted: 21 Sep 2018, 21:20
by jgraney8
RGraf wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 15:03
Per the instructions on the review scorecard page, I was to post my question here. It was noted in a review I submitted that a comma belonged before "but" in this sentence: So much of it reminded me of the world today but with a more sinister edge to it.
I do not think that is right as the clause after "but" is not independent. It is not a complete sentence.
You are correct. The comma rule calls for a comma before
but when
but is a coordinating conjunction. A coordinating conjunction joins two independent clauses. The two phrases after
but do not include a verb nor a subject since both are prepositional phrases -
with a more sinister edge and
to it. For more about
but with commas, which you don't seem to need, you can go to
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/comma-before-but/.
Re: Punctuation in Review
Posted: 22 Sep 2018, 00:02
by gali
RGraf wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 15:03
Per the instructions on the review scorecard page, I was to post my question here. It was noted in a review I submitted that a comma belonged before "but" in this sentence: So much of it reminded me of the world today but with a more sinister edge to it.
I do not think that is right as the clause after "but" is not independent. It is not a complete sentence.
You have the option to appeal that via your RT page.
Re: Punctuation in Review
Posted: 25 Sep 2018, 17:44
by Melekwe Anthony
It's up to you.
The use of punctuations general has always been up to the user and the voice he/she uses to write.
Re: Punctuation in Review
Posted: 26 Sep 2018, 05:39
by MrsCatInTheHat
Melekwe Anthony wrote: ↑25 Sep 2018, 17:44
It's up to you.
The use of punctuations general has always been up to the user and the voice he/she uses to write.
I can see that you are new here. In reviews, editors do look at punctuation and mark off for punctuation that does not follow grammar guidelines. In the case above, it looks like the editor may have erred, but it's not up to the user to just use whatever punctuation that they want to...
Re: Punctuation in Review
Posted: 26 Sep 2018, 09:46
by HollandBlue
I think putting the comma before 'but' would emphasize the statement following it. Also, you started the sentence with 'So', maybe that's why the editor feels there should be a comma. If you read the sentence aloud, there is a pause before the 'but', and that also suggests the need for a comma. Technically, the rule is as you state, but I think that the editor has a point.
Re: Punctuation in Review
Posted: 26 Sep 2018, 21:07
by inaramid
jgraney8 wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 21:20
RGraf wrote: ↑21 Sep 2018, 15:03
Per the instructions on the review scorecard page, I was to post my question here. It was noted in a review I submitted that a comma belonged before "but" in this sentence: So much of it reminded me of the world today but with a more sinister edge to it.
I do not think that is right as the clause after "but" is not independent. It is not a complete sentence.
You are correct. The comma rule calls for a comma before
but when
but is a coordinating conjunction. A coordinating conjunction joins two independent clauses. The two phrases after
but do not include a verb nor a subject since both are prepositional phrases -
with a more sinister edge and
to it. For more about
but with commas, which you don't seem to need, you can go to
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/comma-before-but/.
