Review by jimthorne2 -- The Right to Nominate

This forum is for volunteer reviews by members of our review team. These reviews are done voluntarily by the reviewers and are published in this forum, separate from the official professional reviews. These reviews are kept separate primarily because the same book may be reviewed by many different reviewers.
Post Reply
User avatar
jimthorne2
Posts: 244
Joined: 16 Apr 2017, 20:16
Favorite Book: Christians in the Age of Outrage
Currently Reading: 30th Century: Escape (First Edition)
Bookshelf Size: 165
Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-jimthorne2.html
Latest Review: California: On the Edge of American History by Ronald Genini
Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU

Review by jimthorne2 -- The Right to Nominate

Post by jimthorne2 »

[Following is a volunteer review of "The Right to Nominate" by Thomas E Peterson.]
Book Cover
3 out of 4 stars
Share This Review


The Right to Nominate: Restoring the Power of the People over the Power of the Parties by Thomas Peterson is a study in American political history that advocates a controversial idea from a robust and convincing logical and emotional point of view. Using comments from the Federalist as his text, Peterson makes a viable case showing that the current American political system has radically changed the method of nominating representatives to govern the country from what the Framers of the Constitution envisioned. He calls the resulting political system a ‘Dilemma’ (p. 10).

In seven parts the author compares and contrasts the intent of the Framers of the Constitution with the realities of the political parties that emerged as the result of strong and persuasive personalities. The writer surveys the history of the clash between Hamilton and Jefferson and presents it as the determinative factor in the resulting political scene. The author describes in detail the reasons why the conflict resulted in a two-party system. Peterson then proposes a political solution to the 'Dilemma' with some specific suggestions.

I like the historical commentary Peterson makes about the political scene at the beginning of the United States of America. I like the way he gives famous personalities their say concerning issues surrounding the writing of the Constitution. I appreciate the attempt the author makes at showing how the clash of personalities and the resulting two-party system have resulted in the toxic atmosphere of modern politics.

I do not like the specific suggestions that are made in the book since they appeal more to reason than to practice. I am not impressed with the logic the author uses to explain the best solution to the ‘Dilemma’ presented.

The book is well written providing fascinating historical information. The structure of the narrative is good, and the pace is quite rapid. Personalities are presented fairly and without rancor. Peterson makes the historical personages of Hamilton and Jefferson come alive by careful description and comment. His description of times and events is interesting and adequately conveys not only the history but also the tone of the period involved.

I rate this book 3 out of 4 stars. The author has a valid point but will not persuade many readers that the action he calls for should take place. I recommend the book to a person interested in the political times when the Framers were writing the Constitution. The insights into the personalities are valuable. The issues discussed are important and will give the reader valuable information to consider for his participation in the political process.

******
The Right to Nominate
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon

Like jimthorne2's review? Post a comment saying so!
Jim Thorne
Post Reply

Return to “Volunteer Reviews”