Official Review: A Hole in Science: An Opening for an Alt...

[Anirudh Badri]

[Following is an official OnlineBookClub.org review of "A Hole in Science: An Opening for an Alternative Understanding of Life" by Ted Christopher.]

---

3 out of 4 stars

---

Share This Review

---

A Hole in Science: An Opening for an Alternative Understanding of Life, by Ted Christopher, is a book that seeks to challenge the ‘materialist’ understanding of life which argues that human actions are a direct cause of either genetic factors (DNA) or environmental factors.

The book is a collection of challenges to a materialist notion of life and offers transcendental explanations (involving a soul) for the same. The discussions are far reaching and range from the issue of heritability of intelligence to remembrances of past lives by children to the domestication of foxes. The chapters all follow a similar pattern wherein the author first identifies and explains gaps within the materialist view and then suggests alternative explanations for the same. The author is specifically arguing for the existence of a soul and not in favour of any specific religion, although there is a chapter devoted to a discussion of Buddhism. The book is complete with references to numerous studies, books and articles and is extremely well-researched.

The book is a fantastic attempt to identify some of the existing weaknesses in the explanation of life. Specifically, the section on savants and prodigies poses a significant challenge to an explanation based simply on DNA or the environment. The anecdotes about the same were extremely interesting and the number of such case studies was surprising to me. Even though the conversation is wide-ranging, the author manages to weave it all into a coherent narrative. Finally, the book is extremely well edited and contained no errors that I could identify.

However, the book suffers from some significant setbacks as well. The first and most crucial one is the lack of evidence offered for any of the transcendental explanations. While the book manages to challenge existing explanations, gaps in our current understanding are not an adequate justification for the author's explanation. The author’s explanations thus read more as assertions which are out of place in such a well-researched book. Second, the author belabours the issue with the materialistic viewpoint to the point of boredom. The same issue is brought up again and again with the same challenge being posed to it. This repetition also detracted from my experience of the book.

I rate this book 3 out of 4 stars. I learnt a lot about a variety of interesting subjects and the subject matter was easily accessible to a layman like me, but the negatives I listed prevent me from giving it a perfect rating. I would recommend this book to people who enjoy thinking and reading about the basis for life and have an open mind about such issues.

******
A Hole in Science: An Opening for an Alternative Understanding of Life
View: on Bookshelves | on Amazon

Like Anirudh Badri's review? Post a comment saying so!

[Kibet Hillary]

I would like to read more on the basis for life. However, it is difficult when the arguments being presented are repeated hence making the book to be boring. It would be better to shorten the book and avoid repetitions than having it filled with repetition. The argument that life should not be based on what science offers alone, however, holds to be true.

[crediblereading2]

In my opinion, the actions of human beings are both genetic, environmental and spiritual. It is good and interesting that this book has a different take on it. The author too has a right to present his opinion. I am sorry about the editorial issues in this book. Thank you for your honest review of this book.

[kandscreeley]

This sounds like a very heavy read. It covers many different topics, but I wonder if it would be a detriment that the author doesn't identify with any one religion? There are some similarities, but it seems like there are also major differences. Either way, it does sound interesting for those that enjoy this type of book. Thanks.

[Jackie Holycross]

I always like when someone uses research to support spirituality, but I don't think this one is for me. Thanks.

[EvaDar]

I think I would enjoy this book despite the few evidentiary problems. Finding satisfying proof of non- ordinary factors can be challenging. Thank you for the comprehensive review of this interesting book.

[FictionLover]

The author is specifically arguing for the existence of a soul and not in favour of any specific religion, although there is a chapter devoted to a discussion of Buddhism. The book is complete with references to numerous studies, books and articles and is extremely well-researched.

The book is a fantastic attempt to identify some of the existing weaknesses in the explanation of life. Specifically, the section on savants and prodigies poses a significant challenge to an explanation based simply on DNA or the environment. The anecdotes about the same were extremely interesting and the number of such case studies was surprising to me. Even though the conversation is wide-ranging, the author manages to weave it all into a coherent narrative. Finally, the book is extremely well edited and contained no errors that I could identify.

... The author’s explanations thus read more as assertions which are out of place in such a well-researched book. Second, the author belabours the issue with the materialistic viewpoint to the point of boredom. The same issue is brought up again and again with the same challenge being posed to it. This repetition also detracted from my experience of the book.

This sounds very interesting despite its shortcoming. I'd also like to see how the fox fits in.

I find that anyone who starts out with a pet theory to prove, whether it be in fiction or non-fiction, winds up sounding preachy and boring. Still, it sounds like a very unique read.

Thanks for your honest opinion.