Book title

[Nama Winnie]

For someone who is not familiar with the book, I find the title very catchy. With this title, I would've picked it up to take a closer look if I'd first seen it in a bookstore.

It is very catchy. I was hooked too by the title only. If that was the author's intention then it worked.

[Leen282]

I think a book title should be catchy and inviting, it should not necessarily cover the content of the entire book. For me, the title is well chosen.

The title actually attracted me to try reading it. I think it's catchy but misleading

In what sense was it misleading you? I liked the title, then I read the summary of the book so I knew what to expect.

Of course, a book can still disappoint after that but for me it's not about the title anymore.

[Phelicia Gloria]

Haha.

As I read, I'm beginning to think it should be called 'Revisions.

But I think I may understand the name, maybe the authors intention was to show that he's writing from the human side of things, the relatable side.

I also think that was the author main intention, the human view of the book. Otherwise thanks for dropping a comment

[Phelicia Gloria]

I think this title was not relevant. The author would have considered another title. My opinion!

I think so too but maybe he was viewing it on human perspective.Thanks for the comment.

[Phelicia Gloria]

I think a book title should be catchy and inviting, it should not necessarily cover the content of the entire book. For me, the title is well chosen.

True, maybe that's was the author main intention.

[Phelicia Gloria]

The title did make me think that it was a crime drama rather than a religious book. I think the title should reflect the content of the book more.

That what I thought of it too, only to find the book was more religious.

[Phelicia Gloria]

The title did make me think that it was a crime drama rather than a religious book. I think the title should reflect the content of the book more.

That's what I thought too only to read it and find that it was more of religion than the death of Abel itself.

[Phelicia Gloria]

I loved the title of the book. It's intriguing and captivating. As long as the story of Abel is also in the book then I think the title is relevant and correct.

I agree with you that it's intriguing and captivating but do you think at least the title should cover the whole book not necessarily some parts of it.

[Phelicia Gloria]

I figured this book dealt with the bible in some way judging by the name. It certainly captures the attention.

At first I thought it was more of war than necessary biblical, only to find its more biblical in nature.

[BookLover4Love]

"Why did Cain kill Abel?" This is the question that I thought of once I saw this title. So, I think that the author named his book this specifically to put this question in reader's heads. But yes, the book delves much deeper into biblical history than just Abel's death.

[Susmita Biswas]

The title of the book was perfect. It gets readers attention immediately.

[Free-man]

The stories were good. Although, I think the title was chosen intentionally. It's purpose was to catch the attention of readers. Hence, it didn't connect or relate to the story.

[kaylahk17]

Haha.

As I read, I'm beginning to think it should be called 'Revisions.

But I think I may understand the name, maybe the authors intention was to show that he's writing from the human side of things, the relatable side.

you make a great point here and I appreciate the book title a little more. I like your title too though!

[Jacktone Ogada]

Titles are based on author's judgements, so long as it gives an idea of what the book entails, whether in part or in whole.

[evraealtana]

The title seems intriguing and would invite readers to pick up the book, which I suppose is the point. But I agree with you; it does seem a little off-base, given the content.