Reading as a Stand Alone Book
- briellejee
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: 25 Aug 2017, 23:40
- Currently Reading: Opaque
- Bookshelf Size: 292
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-briellejee.html
- Latest Review: The Watchmaker’s Doctor by G. M. T. Schuilling
Re: Reading as a Stand Alone Book
Just curious, waht made you want to read the previous books? I ahve read all three and I was wondering what part of this part three that made you interested to know more from previous books? Was it from a character or to understand a specific scene?Mbrooks2518 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2019, 17:27 I didn't have any trouble reading it without reading the first two. There were definitely some things I was missing because of not reading the first two, but there was enough background information given that I was never confused, which I think is the most important thing if you are going to start in the middle of a series. Instead, it just made me even more interested in reading the previous books.
- briellejee
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: 25 Aug 2017, 23:40
- Currently Reading: Opaque
- Bookshelf Size: 292
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-briellejee.html
- Latest Review: The Watchmaker’s Doctor by G. M. T. Schuilling
Since a lot of people say that they are just contented with this book, so I'm just curious if you really planned to read them and what made you want to?Faithmwangi wrote: ↑21 Oct 2019, 02:55 Completion is something that I appreciate. Previous books in a series tend to have a build up that leaves you understanding the current book more. That being said, I haven't had the chance to read the previous books and hope to get to them soon.
- briellejee
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: 25 Aug 2017, 23:40
- Currently Reading: Opaque
- Bookshelf Size: 292
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-briellejee.html
- Latest Review: The Watchmaker’s Doctor by G. M. T. Schuilling
Did it, in any other way, made you interested in the other books? because I could see other people saying somehow after reading this, they would want to read the first two books. Was this not the case for you?Ummiii wrote: ↑21 Oct 2019, 10:47 I really think this book could be read as a stand alone. I haven't read the previous books in the series, this is the only one I have read so far but the author wrote the story in a way you wouldn't feel the need to check the other books for recaps. He included all the necessary information you need to know for this book.
- Howlan
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 08:15
- Favorite Book: Looking for Alaska
- Currently Reading: War Graves
- Bookshelf Size: 122
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-howlan.html
- Latest Review: The Soviet Comeback by Jamie Smith
Yes, that defnitely true. I find that truly a good experience in most books i have read. It lets us feel the true purpose of the book and i feel reading any book in a series from the middle is definitely a waste of the book's experience.SHALLU RAWAL wrote: ↑28 Oct 2019, 20:34 I always start a series from the first book. But, if starting from third book, it is very important to have brief knowledge of event and situation that happened in past. The author done a great job in providing flashback of past events. But still I prefer reading from the start as it is very easy to imagine all the event in the story in their correct order. Also this help in remembering the story for long time.
- Howlan
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 08:15
- Favorite Book: Looking for Alaska
- Currently Reading: War Graves
- Bookshelf Size: 122
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-howlan.html
- Latest Review: The Soviet Comeback by Jamie Smith
I agree with reading the series as a whole. I feel it gives a better experience than reading as a stand alone.
- Dorcas Serwaa Adu
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 02 Jun 2018, 19:36
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 14
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dorcas-serwaa-adu.html
- Latest Review: Skills of the Warramunga by Greg Kater
- Howlan
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 08:15
- Favorite Book: Looking for Alaska
- Currently Reading: War Graves
- Bookshelf Size: 122
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-howlan.html
- Latest Review: The Soviet Comeback by Jamie Smith
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 27 Nov 2018, 15:07
- Currently Reading: Restoring Your Child's Mental Health
- Bookshelf Size: 9
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cereader.html
- Latest Review: Skills of the Warramunga by Greg Kater
- Washboard
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 03 May 2019, 19:17
- Currently Reading: Murdered
- Bookshelf Size: 42
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-washboard.html
- Latest Review: The Sunken Forest by R. Barber Anderson
- Washboard
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 03 May 2019, 19:17
- Currently Reading: Murdered
- Bookshelf Size: 42
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-washboard.html
- Latest Review: The Sunken Forest by R. Barber Anderson
This was my first series that I didn't start with the first book. It wasn't my favorite. I agree with you that I prefer to read them in order!
- Washboard
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 03 May 2019, 19:17
- Currently Reading: Murdered
- Bookshelf Size: 42
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-washboard.html
- Latest Review: The Sunken Forest by R. Barber Anderson
I felt like I was missing some context a few times while reading this book. I think I am going to insist on reading all future series in order so I avoid doing that in the future.Howlan wrote: ↑10 Oct 2019, 03:52Yes, that's definitely true. There are a few major flashbacks missing for the main characters.Michelle Fred wrote: ↑03 Oct 2019, 15:55 I doubt I will enjoy reading the third book first even if it's a standalone; I won't be able to shake off the feeling that I 'm missing some details.
- Washboard
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 03 May 2019, 19:17
- Currently Reading: Murdered
- Bookshelf Size: 42
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-washboard.html
- Latest Review: The Sunken Forest by R. Barber Anderson
I also can't help but feel if it is the author's intent to write them in a certain order that I should read them in that same order. It feels like I am disrupting the art of I go out of order. Almost like turning a painting sideways.
- Washboard
- Posts: 483
- Joined: 03 May 2019, 19:17
- Currently Reading: Murdered
- Bookshelf Size: 42
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-washboard.html
- Latest Review: The Sunken Forest by R. Barber Anderson
I read this book as a stand-alone too, and have to say I think I would have enjoyed it more if I had read the series in order. I agree that I don't really know who is new and who has been around for the other books, but I do wish I had some more context for the relationships between the characters.naomisorge wrote: ↑17 Oct 2019, 13:51 I'm also reading it as a stand-alone. Since I have no idea who is a recurring character with a back story and who is new, it doesn't bother me one bit!
-
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 6473
- Joined: 10 May 2017, 19:49
- Currently Reading: The Savior
- Bookshelf Size: 530
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-kdstrack.html
- Latest Review: How To Be Successful by M. Curtis McCoy
- Howlan
- Posts: 1985
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 08:15
- Favorite Book: Looking for Alaska
- Currently Reading: War Graves
- Bookshelf Size: 122
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-howlan.html
- Latest Review: The Soviet Comeback by Jamie Smith
Yes, and also in the earlier series we also get the trust which gets built up among Jamie , Jacko and Johnny Cook and we understand how in the book they didnt hesitate at all at the thought of saving their friends.kdstrack wrote: ↑30 Oct 2019, 21:08 This book does work as a standalone. However, readers would be enriched by a deeper understanding of how Jacko and Jamie met and solidified their relationship. A knowledge of how Jacko and Monique met makes the ending sweeter. The more background information you have about the characters, the easier it will be to relate to the characters and connect with their experiences.