The author is writing this book with already formed his own opinions. So we can't truly say that he is unbiased and merely stating the facts that he found. In that context, he could have clearly exposed which side he is supporting to and make clear arguments rather than stating the facts that he found and giving the reader the impression that the reader can make his/her own decision, which is actually notPamela Bianca Mas wrote: ↑12 Dec 2020, 07:45 I think it is perfectly fine for the author to not have a solid stand with the arguments in the book simply because she is letting her readers decide on their own. She presents points to be taken in consideration, but gives her audience the freedom to think for themselves.
The author is not having a solid stand. Is that okay?
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: Quest: Finding Freddie
- Bookshelf Size: 412
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Unsettled Disruption by Juana Catalina Rodriguez
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Re: The author is not having a solid stand. Is that okay?
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: Quest: Finding Freddie
- Bookshelf Size: 412
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Unsettled Disruption by Juana Catalina Rodriguez
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
It is good of a book is not conveying decisions, but facts which are helpful for decision making. Yet, as this author is having his own opinions, the facts that he stated are directive towards a set of conclusions which are in a very narrow range. In that case, the author could have clearly taken a side and build up the argument, so the reader could have thought for or against thatEva Stoyanova wrote: ↑12 Dec 2020, 10:13Exactly. Maybe the whole point of the book is to be objective and to let readers have their own opinion and thoughts on the matter. It's important and quite nice to actually have our own thoughts on something we read, and not simply following and believing what books are saying.PeterRabitt20 wrote: ↑09 Dec 2020, 20:54 I think it might actually make her more objective and credible. It could be that she doesn't want to influence the readers' opinion.
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: Quest: Finding Freddie
- Bookshelf Size: 412
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Unsettled Disruption by Juana Catalina Rodriguez
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
By being arbitrary about taking a side, the author has written a book which will be appealing to many. Yet he is not fully neutral in his writing, since he is already having his beliefs about the presence of a Supreme being. So though it seems unintentional, the author has directed the reader towards his own opinions. So he could have clearly stated that rather than merely giving the false idea that the reader is making his/her own decisionsSararob06 wrote: ↑12 Dec 2020, 20:20 I think in order to foster a healthy discussion the author should not take sides. Religion is deeply personal and trying to apply scientific rationale too aggressively could come across as attacking religion. I think cementing her stance would dissuade the opposing side from reading her book which furthers the divide.
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: Quest: Finding Freddie
- Bookshelf Size: 412
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Unsettled Disruption by Juana Catalina Rodriguez
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
As he is not having any solid stand, or as he is pretending that he doesn't have, the book could have been unbiased. Yet it doesn't. That means that he has not allowed the reader to think fully free and make his/her own decisions. In that case the author could have revealed where he actually stands. And yes, that will have averted some of the audienceAdedayo+23 wrote: ↑13 Dec 2020, 06:55 I believe the author's intention is to reach a wider audience and create space for deep contemplations and thought-provoking discussions which is not a bad thing. Taking a solid stand may likely alienate certain categories of people who might not agree with the author's stand, or feel that her arguments are biased in favor of either science or religion depending on which side she picks. I believe there's nothing wrong with her decision not to have a solid stand.
- Wy_Bertram
- Posts: 365
- Joined: 11 Feb 2020, 05:19
- Favorite Book: 1984
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 121
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-wy-bertram.html
- Latest Review: WatchDogs Abnormal Beginnings by Mike L Junior
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: Quest: Finding Freddie
- Bookshelf Size: 412
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Unsettled Disruption by Juana Catalina Rodriguez
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
After his own struggle with the religious teachings, the author has made his own conclusions. And he states those facts in this book. So finally what happens is that the reader going towards the writers conclusions. By not having a solid stand on either side, the author has masked that and given the idea to the reader that he/she is making his/her own conclusions, which is not 100% correctMaddie Atkinson wrote: ↑13 Dec 2020, 11:07On the other hand, the author is trying to make sense of his own beliefs, so in a way it makes sense for them to be taking a a side in the argument. I don't think he mentions that he is going to make a balanced argument, and while it might some sense for him to have raised some points against his argument, I think it's fair that he hasn't as this is based on making sense of his own religious values and the struggle that he has faced with them.Sararob06 wrote: ↑12 Dec 2020, 20:20 I think in order to foster a healthy discussion the author should not take sides. Religion is deeply personal and trying to apply scientific rationale too aggressively could come across as attacking religion. I think cementing her stance would dissuade the opposing side from reading her book which furthers the divide.
- PeterRabitt20
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: 12 Oct 2020, 10:35
- Currently Reading: Verity
- Bookshelf Size: 127
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-peterrabitt20.html
- Latest Review: The Power Of Our Inner Gremlins by Suzanne Daplyn
Well said. Yes, I find myself sometimes just going along with a book, only to realize that my ideas are different.Eva Stoyanova wrote: ↑12 Dec 2020, 10:13Exactly. Maybe the whole point of the book is to be objective and to let readers have their own opinion and thoughts on the matter. It's important and quite nice to actually have our own thoughts on something we read, and not simply following and believing what books are saying.PeterRabitt20 wrote: ↑09 Dec 2020, 20:54 I think it might actually make her more objective and credible. It could be that she doesn't want to influence the readers' opinion.
- Intel
- Posts: 109
- Joined: 09 Aug 2020, 09:57
- Favorite Book: The Hobbit
- Currently Reading: Fahrenheit 451
- Bookshelf Size: 28
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-intel.html
- Latest Review: Timewise by Robert Leet
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: Quest: Finding Freddie
- Bookshelf Size: 412
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Unsettled Disruption by Juana Catalina Rodriguez
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
Religions can get very much personal. The devouts can interpret it as per their knowledge and beliefs. But in this book the author has just stated the facts without going into any conclusions, so such devouts can use the facts in the book as per their wish. Thus the author has made the book to reach a wide audienceWy_Bertram wrote: ↑13 Dec 2020, 19:17 I've always felt like religion is a completely personal affair. It's like different people taking different roads to a particular destination, and I appreciate the author allowing the reader to find their own road.
- Sushan Ekanayake
- Official Reviewer Representative
- Posts: 4913
- Joined: 04 May 2018, 19:13
- Currently Reading: Quest: Finding Freddie
- Bookshelf Size: 412
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-sushan-ekanayake.html
- Latest Review: Unsettled Disruption by Juana Catalina Rodriguez
- Reading Device: B0794JC2K5
A good point. The author merely says many things without putting any weight towards any side of his argument. If he cannot find a strong side of his argument, how can the reader trust what the author says?Intel wrote: ↑14 Dec 2020, 10:28 I think it is more prevent to some outsiders when a person's stance isn't set in stone. It makes the message come across as open. I do see what you mean though, because how can you trust the words of someone who stands by nothing, or not by what they say. Very intriguing.
- cookiedough
- Posts: 217
- Joined: 05 Jun 2020, 20:35
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 24
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cookiedough.html
- Latest Review: Dying Well by Susan Ducharme Hoben
-
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 594
- Joined: 02 Jul 2020, 09:53
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 150
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-eunice-geres.html
- Latest Review: I Wonder Why It's Christmas by Esther Ekunola
- AnnieOgoo
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 06 Dec 2020, 09:26
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 27
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-annieogoo.html
- Latest Review: Serendipity Mystery: Diary of a Snoopy Cat by R.F. Kristi
Besides, religion is a very controversial topic (one of the most controversial ever). Thus, taking SOLID sides requires an unshakable conviction. And I think that was exactly what the author was trying to avoid. He wanted everyone to choose and decide for themselves, just as he has.
- Ahbed Nadir
- Posts: 306
- Joined: 14 Nov 2020, 02:33
- Currently Reading: Brandy, Ballad of a Pirate Princess
- Bookshelf Size: 51
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ahbed-nadir.html
- Latest Review: There's Always Tomorrow by Jim Carr
-
- Posts: 311
- Joined: 29 Jun 2018, 01:23
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 152
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-dianaterrado.html
- Latest Review: Love, Grandma by Ann Morris