Review of Nemesis 6

[Rocky Ellery James Tumbelaka]

The sixth mass extinction. Now that really intrigues me. There are so many things we can learn for this book. I really want to know about this One Biosphere, One People. Thanks for the review.

[Aan Granados]

It is sad that humans are the one destroying our planet by over -consumption, industrialization and mostly greed especially by big corporations and by the people in government. This book is an eye-opener. Thanks for your review!

[Carina Callegaro]

It was the first time I came across a read like Nemesis 6 on this platform. I am pleasantly surprised; it's refreshing to read more on a knowledge-based standpoint, and I enjoy scientific reads. Thanks for your review, I believe that it connects well with what the book itself has to offer.

[RUTH OTHNIEL]

Wonderful book to read. When we realize that as human beings we have the capacity to bring solutions we will adjust our thinking and take the necessary actions to do so instead of just depending on the media and political leaders .God has given us the earth to take care of, not to destroy. Am motivated to read this book to the end and encourage others to read too and be actively involved in the welfare of our planet. Thanks for the good review.

[Mercy Joy 6233]

Each one of us should have a mindset to improve the future of our planet.Thanks for the review.

[Meghan Soderholm]

I love the review and am curious to read this book. I’m also intrigued by the historical references mixed with science fiction. Those are usually compelling reads.

[tortle0o0]

This sounds to be a sort of sci-fi and theoretical political novel intended to address current and future problems plaguing humanity. It's hard to get a grasp on what is fact and what is theory from this review, but I suppose I'll just need to buy a copy and find out for myself!

[Shirley Ann Riddern Labzentis]

This sounds like a very interesting book for young readers. Even though I am not a young reader, I am interested in reading it to see what it is all about. Great review, by the way!

[SINGH JAY]

Congrats on the BOTD!
information on how human negligence and industrialization are harming the planet and generating drastic climatic changes. There is no doubt that the author did a thorough amount of research. I was astounded to discover that the weakening of the permafrost layer will bring about the next disaster.

[Sanju Lali]

An enlighting science project based book "Nemesis 6" by Richard Mollinger, which follows the Anthropocene, a the greatest threat humanity has ever faced, has been unlocked. This book appears interesting to read.

[momanyi enock]

The book Nemesis 6 by Richard Mollinger provides strategic solutions to address the catastrophic consequences of the Anthropocene, focusing on the health of our biosphere. The book's historical context of European history and the ongoing effort to break free from human ignorance, greed, and destruction is beneficial. The author's use of the term "revolution" emphasizes the accomplishments and faults of significant revolutionists in history. The book's focus on climate change and decarbonization in alliance with democracy, Keynesian economics, and "STEAM" is encouraging. It is a recommended read for young readers interested in science-based projects.

[Olga Markova]

Having sampled this well-researched book, I fully agree with the reviewer's thoughts and recommendations, especially about the enlightening nature of this book for young readers emphasizing the impact of human activities on the environment resulting in drastic eco-changes. Fans of scientific books on environmental protection would be thrilled to read it!

[Benard Mayaka]

Young people like me should find it an interesting book to read because of its emphasis on the need for unity. It is a proof that United we stand but when we are divided we fall.

[Kajori Sheryl Paul]

Anthropocene sounds scary.

Thank you for the great review.

[Sarah Zain]

this is good review. The topic of the book is interesting and encouraging to be read. I love the types that open a port to discussion. But my main concern is the language used whether it is scientifically difficult or not.