Too much character?
- rines
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 21 Jan 2014, 17:27
- Favorite Book: Wuthering Heights and Grimm Reapings
- Currently Reading: Solitude Vampire Hunter D others
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Too much character?
- Devon Drake
- Posts: 9
- Joined: 22 Jan 2014, 01:56
- Favorite Book: Timequake by Kurt Vonnegut
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- rines
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 21 Jan 2014, 17:27
- Favorite Book: Wuthering Heights and Grimm Reapings
- Currently Reading: Solitude Vampire Hunter D others
- Bookshelf Size: 0
-
- Posts: 358
- Joined: 18 Mar 2013, 11:48
- Bookshelf Size: 0
This seems to me to be silly. If characters do not have their own moment in a book, they would not be important, so the author must "give a character such a moment".
If important characters did not have their own moments to begin with , how did you know they were important in the first place? Why does the author have to write additional material about this important character?
This goes to my disagreement with those who say they create characters first. A character cannot be important in the story without being important in the story. Sounds like double-talk, but to me no less so than suggesting that an important character must be given an important part.
It's like: "He's a fascinating character; Special Forces trained astrophysicist married to neurotic daughter of former US President. Best character I ever created. I want to use him."
Yeah, but your book is about a family of Paleolithic nomads...
-- 27 Jan 2014, 16:36 --
As for the OP. let me answer your question with another that I hopes answers you:
Are all people alike? Alright a second - do you know anyone with a powerful personality?
- rines
- Posts: 23
- Joined: 21 Jan 2014, 17:27
- Favorite Book: Wuthering Heights and Grimm Reapings
- Currently Reading: Solitude Vampire Hunter D others
- Bookshelf Size: 0