king lear
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 18 Jun 2011, 00:35
- Bookshelf Size: 0
king lear

- Artdude
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 01 Mar 2011, 15:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
1) The story line(s).
The main plot, with Lear's daughters rejecting him, and forging a corrupt and immoral state of affairs with his old land, and how they treat him, and manipulate, and reduce him to an animal, is truly brilliant. This is carefully weaved into the sub-plot, which is mirrored image of offspring rejection, only it results in physical mutilation, huge dramatic irony, and ultimately pathos, in terms of audience response. This is truly remarkable, how they so easily cross each other, and how they stand alone as a a great framework for the rest.
2) The language.
The inummerable amount of poignant, and emotionally challenging, and interesting lines which can be found in Lear are just amazing. "Like flies to Wanton boys are we to the God's, they kill us for their sport," "But I am bound upon a wheel of fire, That mine own tears do scald like molten lead," and "Strike flat the thick rotundity of the world," are but three examples of finely crafted speech. The extent to which Shakespeare manipulates words, and uses them as his most powerful weapon, is... well... it truly is the work of a genius.
3) The Themes examined
Arguably the most amazing part of Lear is the breadth, and depth of the themes which go under the microscope. Blindness, Madness, Father daughter and father-son relationships, folly, power, property, rejection, immorality.... I mean it is truly endless. There is always something new in that respect. 'Something for everyone' if you want to be twilight-fannish about it.
It is unavoidable, that Lear is one of the most challenging plays that Shakespeare wrote, but I feel that the dramatic world is better for it.
- Maud Fitch
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: 28 Feb 2011, 23:05
- Favorite Book: The Eyre Affair
- Bookshelf Size: 0
- Artdude
- Posts: 114
- Joined: 01 Mar 2011, 15:08
- Bookshelf Size: 0
First of all thankyou - I care deeply about Lear.Maud Fitch wrote:Beautifully expressed, Artdude, but don't you think modern literature can be just as magnificent without the veiled mystique, the allure of an era long gone? Or maybe everyone else copied Shakespeare?
You raise an interesting point - and I think it can be. However, I think it's worth suggesting that because it's so much easier to be a published author in this century, and the previous, it seems like you have to wade through more mire to arrive at an oasis. It's much like music in that respect - it seems to me you can be a published author without any kind of reputation, which is an uncensored, uadulterated way of producing art. This is not necessarily a bad thing, but it requires more work. That's how I see it anyway - of course Modern Literature can be magnificent, but it seems that with the benefit of hindisght, the world has chosen it's favourites, and I quite like adhering to those choices.
- Fran
- Posts: 28072
- Joined: 10 Aug 2009, 12:46
- Favorite Book: Anna Karenina
- Currently Reading: Hide and Seek
- Bookshelf Size: 1207
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-fran.html
- Reading Device: B00I15SB16
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: 18 Jun 2011, 00:35
- Bookshelf Size: 0
Reading Shakespeare I must content is not easy business.,but look at it as you would say exercising or harvesting honey- hard tasks with rewarding outcomes.
Feel encouraged to read this play.
Indeed one says that watching the play on stage is best. True True. It is also exciting to watch especially if you have read so that you are able to follow and enjoy the more.