Who is the most responsible character? The least?
- Manang Muyang
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 11186
- Joined: 02 May 2017, 20:17
- Favorite Book:
- Currently Reading: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures
- Bookshelf Size: 687
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-manang-muyang.html
- Latest Review: Your Great Name by Shawn Funk
- Reading Device: B00KC6I06S
Who is the most responsible character? The least?
Who of the characters behaved most responsibly? Least responsibly?
My personal favorite is Vijay. He is almost too good to be true.
- britt13
- Posts: 473
- Joined: 04 Nov 2017, 21:19
- Currently Reading: the last of the really great wangdoodlea
- Bookshelf Size: 165
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-britt13.html
- Latest Review: Timewise by Robert Leet
- Manang Muyang
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 11186
- Joined: 02 May 2017, 20:17
- Favorite Book:
- Currently Reading: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures
- Bookshelf Size: 687
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-manang-muyang.html
- Latest Review: Your Great Name by Shawn Funk
- Reading Device: B00KC6I06S
- [Valerie Allen]
- Posts: 698
- Joined: 17 Mar 2018, 23:24
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 783
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-valerie-allen.html
- Latest Review: Utopia Project by Billy Dering
- BookishCreature
- Posts: 509
- Joined: 12 Jan 2018, 15:41
- Currently Reading: Travels with Vamper
- Bookshelf Size: 247
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-bookishcreature.html
- Latest Review: The Library of Secrets: The Giant Mistake by Zoe Penn
- nobunkum
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 03 Mar 2018, 21:35
- Currently Reading: The Caucasus
- Bookshelf Size: 298
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-nobunkum.html
- Latest Review: The Girl Who Knew Da Vinci by Belle Ami
I think that that is one thing that the book just slightly hits as a collateral topic: responsibility of different players in their respective roles. I think it could have done a little better job showing a little more balanced opinion on the matter but it makes you think. I like this thought experiment because I feel like in our current society our rights are always trumped up and our responsibilities are pushed underneath the rug.
And the way you asked your question is interesting too. How you lumped people into certain categories makes me think if as a part of those categories that they do or should have specific roles to play in our society. Then as a part of that role, what should they have an obligation to do or control and care over.
Possible obligations as a part of their role in society:
Seniors: remind of past- failures and successes? warn, protect, counsel? be involved? volunteer?
Immigrants: integration? better behavior than natural citizens? share their culture in an understanding way?
The media: fair reporting? ethical reporting? timely reporting?
Doctors: do no harm? balancing confidentiality and need to disclose? being a watchdog or patriarchal position?
Capitalists: primary responsibility to shareholders? the environment? full disclosure? society?
The investigators: safest society as possible? or just upholding and enforcing the current laws?
NRA: protect the second amendment? help gun owners be more responsible?
Interestingly enough, with this mindset I would say that Vince actually acted very responsible for the most part. Even though I disliked him as a character I would have to say he acted very responsible. In his role as a senior, he was responsible to learn more about what was happening around him, researching more what was really going on, he was involved with those around him. As a natural citizen he was responsible in embracing immigrants, befriending them, and helping them integrate into American society. As a patient and husband he was responsible when ever though he was told he was going to die he took the doctors advice and followed through with all of the treatment for the hope that he could survive and take care of Trudi. As a husband and owner and community member he was responsible in following up with the police when a crime happened. This part is perhaps debatable but he was responsible to fight to protect his neighborhood and family from criminals that were not contributing to his community. (Spoiler alert) As a gun owner, you could argue that he was responsible for getting rid of the gun when he realized that for him and his wife it wasn't safe for them to have access to it. In a lot of ways he was very responsible even if he wasn't that great of a character for me.
It is interesting that Vijay is a favorite among you readers as I have a different experience with him. I feel like he was one of the less responsible characters. It is likely that as he was previously a medical doctor, he has taken the Hippocratic oath or at the very least operated in an environment where doctors are presumed to adhere to certain medical ethics. Two common ones are medical confidentiality and non-maleficence or do no harm. The book doesn't cover this at all but when a medical diagnostic device (such as the watch) is developed it is actually regulated by the FDA. They have certain procedures in place to document and monitor adverse events regarding new devices. The underlying assumption being that doctors should proceed forward with new devices with caution, monitoring for and doing everything to minimize risks to participants. In current research, if researchers administer psychological tests that indicate that the participant is suicidal or a threat to themselves or others it is generally accepted that the researcher has an obligation to report it. And in certain circumstances, if the research or device itself creates adverse events they are required to minimize the events. In the book he just says, oh lets increase the beta test and try to monitor who has guns and who doesn't. I think in the real world there is no way that current ethical regulatory bodies would find that acceptable. In his duty to do no harm it shouldn't matter how popular the feature is or the theoretical upsides of it would be. If he was responsible in his role of a doctor, he should have worked to find a way to minimize the risks not just said oh what can we do, it's the NRA's fault. I'm less versed in business ethics but it would see that it was a little irresponsible to his investors and to his own company to start a romantic relationship with the account manager of the investing firm. In this case it seems like it worked out for him and his company but it easily could have been a liability to both sides. Likewise, it is hinted at that as a son and brother he has guilt about what he has done for his family but doesn't really do much about it. Perhaps give his parents a nicer house but he doesn't seem to do much in terms of what might perhaps be expected of him as an Indian son and brother (once again, not well versed in those societal expectations and roles).
It is interesting to go through each character and think about this. The reporter (his obligation to his audience versus a pretty girl), the senator (his obligation to protect his household versus the truth), Vince's doctor (to disclose information about his patient without his patient's knowledge versus providing feedback to a company). It is very interesting to think back about this book in those terms. Thank you for the question.
- Manang Muyang
- Previous Member of the Month
- Posts: 11186
- Joined: 02 May 2017, 20:17
- Favorite Book:
- Currently Reading: Donny and Mary Grace's California Adventures
- Bookshelf Size: 687
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-manang-muyang.html
- Latest Review: Your Great Name by Shawn Funk
- Reading Device: B00KC6I06S
- Shrabastee Chakraborty
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 2533
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018, 00:38
- Favorite Book: The Warramunga's War
- Currently Reading: Timewise
- Bookshelf Size: 1164
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shrabastee-chakraborty.html
- Latest Review: The Infinite Passion of Life by D.J. Paolini
The least responsible? Well, the NRA, at least in the way they are depicted in the book.
- Shrabastee Chakraborty
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 2533
- Joined: 23 Mar 2018, 00:38
- Favorite Book: The Warramunga's War
- Currently Reading: Timewise
- Bookshelf Size: 1164
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-shrabastee-chakraborty.html
- Latest Review: The Infinite Passion of Life by D.J. Paolini
Wow! Needless to say, it was very thoughtful of you. I agree with you on your analysis of Vijay's character, while his intentions seem good, his actions are somewhat puzzling, particularly those regarding the alpha and beta tests. Also, I could not believe that he couldn't have persuaded his family to enjoy a relaxed and more comfortable life, although in the end, they seem to have come around. Thank you for your views.nobunkum wrote: ↑16 Apr 2018, 19:20 Your question is really interesting. Because I feel like being a nerd, to answer your question more accurately I looked up the word responsible: "Having an obligation to do something, or having control over or care for someone, as part of one's job or role."
I think that that is one thing that the book just slightly hits as a collateral topic: responsibility of different players in their respective roles. I think it could have done a little better job showing a little more balanced opinion on the matter but it makes you think. I like this thought experiment because I feel like in our current society our rights are always trumped up and our responsibilities are pushed underneath the rug.
And the way you asked your question is interesting too. How you lumped people into certain categories makes me think if as a part of those categories that they do or should have specific roles to play in our society. Then as a part of that role, what should they have an obligation to do or control and care over.
Possible obligations as a part of their role in society:
Seniors: remind of past- failures and successes? warn, protect, counsel? be involved? volunteer?
Immigrants: integration? better behavior than natural citizens? share their culture in an understanding way?
The media: fair reporting? ethical reporting? timely reporting?
Doctors: do no harm? balancing confidentiality and need to disclose? being a watchdog or patriarchal position?
Capitalists: primary responsibility to shareholders? the environment? full disclosure? society?
The investigators: safest society as possible? or just upholding and enforcing the current laws?
NRA: protect the second amendment? help gun owners be more responsible?
Interestingly enough, with this mindset I would say that Vince actually acted very responsible for the most part. Even though I disliked him as a character I would have to say he acted very responsible. In his role as a senior, he was responsible to learn more about what was happening around him, researching more what was really going on, he was involved with those around him. As a natural citizen he was responsible in embracing immigrants, befriending them, and helping them integrate into American society. As a patient and husband he was responsible when ever though he was told he was going to die he took the doctors advice and followed through with all of the treatment for the hope that he could survive and take care of Trudi. As a husband and owner and community member he was responsible in following up with the police when a crime happened. This part is perhaps debatable but he was responsible to fight to protect his neighborhood and family from criminals that were not contributing to his community. (Spoiler alert) As a gun owner, you could argue that he was responsible for getting rid of the gun when he realized that for him and his wife it wasn't safe for them to have access to it. In a lot of ways he was very responsible even if he wasn't that great of a character for me.
It is interesting that Vijay is a favorite among you readers as I have a different experience with him. I feel like he was one of the less responsible characters. It is likely that as he was previously a medical doctor, he has taken the Hippocratic oath or at the very least operated in an environment where doctors are presumed to adhere to certain medical ethics. Two common ones are medical confidentiality and non-maleficence or do no harm. The book doesn't cover this at all but when a medical diagnostic device (such as the watch) is developed it is actually regulated by the FDA. They have certain procedures in place to document and monitor adverse events regarding new devices. The underlying assumption being that doctors should proceed forward with new devices with caution, monitoring for and doing everything to minimize risks to participants. In current research, if researchers administer psychological tests that indicate that the participant is suicidal or a threat to themselves or others it is generally accepted that the researcher has an obligation to report it. And in certain circumstances, if the research or device itself creates adverse events they are required to minimize the events. In the book he just says, oh lets increase the beta test and try to monitor who has guns and who doesn't. I think in the real world there is no way that current ethical regulatory bodies would find that acceptable. In his duty to do no harm it shouldn't matter how popular the feature is or the theoretical upsides of it would be. If he was responsible in his role of a doctor, he should have worked to find a way to minimize the risks not just said oh what can we do, it's the NRA's fault. I'm less versed in business ethics but it would see that it was a little irresponsible to his investors and to his own company to start a romantic relationship with the account manager of the investing firm. In this case it seems like it worked out for him and his company but it easily could have been a liability to both sides. Likewise, it is hinted at that as a son and brother he has guilt about what he has done for his family but doesn't really do much about it. Perhaps give his parents a nicer house but he doesn't seem to do much in terms of what might perhaps be expected of him as an Indian son and brother (once again, not well versed in those societal expectations and roles).
It is interesting to go through each character and think about this. The reporter (his obligation to his audience versus a pretty girl), the senator (his obligation to protect his household versus the truth), Vince's doctor (to disclose information about his patient without his patient's knowledge versus providing feedback to a company). It is very interesting to think back about this book in those terms. Thank you for the question.
- holsam_87
- Posts: 858
- Joined: 03 Feb 2018, 15:45
- Currently Reading: The Unbound Soul
- Bookshelf Size: 1691
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-holsam-87.html
- Latest Review: Herai by Aaron D Key
- Reading Device: B00IKPYKWG
I think all the characters showed degrees of responsibility, with Vijay being the most since he had good intentions for creating the watch and technology. The one who was least responsible was Vince since he actively went looking for the two men that attacked him and Miles. My favorite character is Miles, mainly because I love dogs and enjoyed how he interacted with his owners.Miriam Molina wrote: ↑28 Mar 2018, 20:01 The book features many characters: seniors, immigrants, the media, the doctors and capitalists, the investigators, and of course, the NRA. We read about many killings, racism, and yes, heroism and selflessness, too.
Who of the characters behaved most responsibly? Least responsibly?
My personal favorite is Vijay. He is almost too good to be true.
“We’ve all got both light and dark inside us. What matters is the part we choose to act on. That’s who we really are.”
—J. K. Rowling, Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
- Okafor Prosper
- Posts: 1006
- Joined: 09 Jul 2017, 06:19
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 250
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-okafor-prosper.html
- Latest Review: 52 Pieces: by Dr. Marina Kostina
- CheyenneR
- Posts: 179
- Joined: 11 Feb 2018, 23:37
- Currently Reading:
- Bookshelf Size: 21
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-cheyenner.html
- Latest Review: World, Incorporated by Tom Gariffo
- Renu G
- Posts: 753
- Joined: 06 Mar 2019, 01:32
- Currently Reading: Masters and Bastards
- Bookshelf Size: 144
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-renu-g.html
- Latest Review: The Roving Mind: A Modern Approach to Cognitive Enhancement by Anthony Simola
-
- Posts: 326
- Joined: 06 Sep 2021, 10:38
- Favorite Book: Kalayla
- Currently Reading: Global Business in the Age of Transformation
- Bookshelf Size: 95
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-j-edwards.html
- Latest Review: Of Zots and Xoodles by Zarqnon the Embarrassed
“We don’t receive wisdom; we must discover it for ourselves after a journey that no one can take for us or spare us.”
French novelist Marcel Proust.
-
- Book of the Month Participant
- Posts: 328
- Joined: 16 Jan 2022, 06:27
- Favorite Book: Rescuing General Patton
- Currently Reading: Desperate Season
- Bookshelf Size: 74
- Reviewer Page: onlinebookclub.org/reviews/by-ruth-frances-a.html
- Latest Review: Lucky by Spare Time Novels
- Reading Device: B00JG8GOWU
Zoe and Demi were great too. Zoe, ignored the signs of possible betrayal but is brave enough to confront the issues. Vik is a disappointment. In my opinion, all the characters had a responsibility towards their actions and decisions thereafter.